Head to head
Firecrawl MCP Server vs MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Firecrawl, the context API for AI agents: search, scrape, interact with the web, plus paper search.
Full listingNo reviews yet
Scrape any website, extract structured data, and collect web content at scale with AI agents
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (90 and 92 out of 100). Firecrawl MCP Server has noticeably more public adoption.
| Firecrawl MCP Server | MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A90/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | Widely used | Established |
| GitHub stars | 7.8k | 15 |
| Downloads / week | 159k | 724 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | ISC |
| Last release | 2026-11-03 | 2026-11-11 |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |