Head to head
Firecrawl MCP Server vs fastCRW
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Firecrawl, the context API for AI agents: search, scrape, interact with the web, plus paper search.
Full listingNo reviews yet
Scrape, crawl, map & search the web. Open-source, self-hostable Rust crawler & search for AI agents.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours fastCRW (98/100 against 90). Firecrawl MCP Server has noticeably more public adoption.
| Firecrawl MCP Server | fastCRW | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A90/100 | A98/100 |
| Adoption | Widely used | Established |
| GitHub stars | 7.8k | 1.1k |
| Downloads / week | 159k | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Last release | 2026-11-03 | 2026-09-24 |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |