MCP.Market

Head to head

CRW Web Scraper vs Firecrawl MCP Server

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

CRW Web Scraperio.github.fastcrw/crw
A
No reviews yet

Open-source web scraper for AI agents with scrape, crawl, and map tools

Full listing
Firecrawl MCP Serverio.github.firecrawl/firecrawl-mcp-server
A
No reviews yet

Firecrawl, the context API for AI agents: search, scrape, interact with the web, plus paper search.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (85 and 90 out of 100). Firecrawl MCP Server is hosted and callable through the gateway; CRW Web Scraper runs on your own machine. Firecrawl MCP Server has noticeably more public adoption.

 CRW Web ScraperFirecrawl MCP Server
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA85/100A90/100
AdoptionEstablishedWidely used
GitHub stars1.1k7.8k
Downloads / week–159k
Runs whereYour machine (local)Hosted (remote)
Gateway-readyNoYes
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceAGPL-3.0MIT
Last release2026-09-302026-11-03
CategoryScraping and browsingScraping and browsing

Other comparisons

CRW Web Scraper vs fastCRWAll Scraping and browsing servers