Head to head
searxNcrawl vs CLIO Web
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Web search via SearXNG and/or You.com, plus clean Markdown crawling via Crawl4AI. Self-hosted.
Full listingNo reviews yet
Provider-fixed web search plus transparent URL, DOI, and document fetching
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours CLIO Web (94/100 against 85).
| searxNcrawl | CLIO Web | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A85/100 | A94/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Established |
| GitHub stars | 167 | 30 |
| Downloads / week | 213 | 8.9k |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | BSD-3-Clause |
| Last release | 2026-10-15 | 2026-10-28 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |