Head to head
searxNcrawl vs Exa Search
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Web search via SearXNG and/or You.com, plus clean Markdown crawling via Crawl4AI. Self-hosted.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (85 and 88 out of 100). Exa Search is hosted and callable through the gateway; searxNcrawl runs on your own machine.
| searxNcrawl | Exa Search | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A85/100 | A88/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Established |
| GitHub stars | 167 | 5.2k |
| Downloads / week | 213 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 3 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-10-15 | 2026-10-01 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |