Head to head
searxNcrawl vs DocsMint
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Web search via SearXNG and/or You.com, plus clean Markdown crawling via Crawl4AI. Self-hosted.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Cloud or self-hosted knowledge for AI agents: hybrid search, reranking, GraphRAG, scoped MCP tools.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours DocsMint (96/100 against 85). DocsMint is hosted and callable through the gateway; searxNcrawl runs on your own machine.
| searxNcrawl | DocsMint | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A85/100 | A96/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Established |
| GitHub stars | 167 | 118 |
| Downloads / week | 213 | 1.6k |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 3 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-10-15 | 2026-09-28 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |