Head to head
Phi Guard vs Context by Fulcra
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Local-first PHI detection for source code, LLM prompts, logs, and analytics
Full listing
No reviews yet
Connect your Fulcra Context personal datastore: access your metrics, events, agent data and more
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Context by Fulcra (100/100 against 92). Context by Fulcra is hosted and callable through the gateway; Phi Guard runs on your own machine. Context by Fulcra has noticeably more public adoption.
| Phi Guard | Context by Fulcra | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | A100/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 6 |
| Downloads / week | 90 | 326 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 2 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |