Mmcp.market

Head to head

Phi Guard vs Image

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Phi Guardio.github.Abidit/phi-guard-mcp
A
No reviews yet

Local-first PHI detection for source code, LLM prompts, logs, and analytics

Full listing
Imageio.github.shinpr/mcp-image
B
No reviews yet

AI image generation and editing with prompt optimization and quality presets

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Phi Guard (92/100 against 83). Image has noticeably more public adoption.

 Phi GuardImage
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA92/100B83/100
AdoptionGrowingEstablished
GitHub stars0166
Downloads / week902.1k
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools21
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITMIT
Last release2026-09-182026-09-10
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

Phi Guard vs Agent-Native AnalyticsPhi Guard vs HOL GuardPhi Guard vs prompt-protectionPhi Guard vs mcpmPhi Guard vs haiku.ragAll AI and agents servers