Head to head
Phi Guard vs mcpm
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Local-first PHI detection for source code, LLM prompts, logs, and analytics
Full listingmcpm
Bio.github.getmcpm/cliNo reviews yet
MCP security guard + package manager: trust-scored installs, blocks prompt injection and rug-pulls.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Phi Guard (92/100 against 83).
| Phi Guard | mcpm | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 3 |
| Downloads / week | 90 | 349 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 2 | 10 |
| Write actions | — | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |