Mmcp.market

Head to head

Phi Guard vs HOL Guard

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Phi Guardio.github.Abidit/phi-guard-mcp
A
No reviews yet

Local-first PHI detection for source code, LLM prompts, logs, and analytics

Full listing
HOL Guardio.github.hashgraph-online/hol-guard
C
No reviews yet

Local-first AI agent security evidence and approval workflows through HOL Guard's stdio MCP server.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Phi Guard (92/100 against 60). HOL Guard has noticeably more public adoption.

 Phi GuardHOL Guard
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA92/100C60/100
AdoptionGrowingEstablished
GitHub stars0630
Downloads / week90–
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools26
Write actions—1
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITApache-2.0
Last release2026-09-182026-09-19
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

Phi Guard vs Agent-Native AnalyticsPhi Guard vs prompt-protectionPhi Guard vs mcpmPhi Guard vs Servosity MCPPhi Guard vs haiku.ragAll AI and agents servers