Head to head
Phi Guard vs Agent-Native Analytics
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Local-first PHI detection for source code, LLM prompts, logs, and analytics
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (92 and 98 out of 100). Agent-Native Analytics is hosted and callable through the gateway; Phi Guard runs on your own machine. Agent-Native Analytics has noticeably more public adoption.
| Phi Guard | Agent-Native Analytics | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | A98/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 4.9k |
| Downloads / week | 90 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 2 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |