create-llms skill
Create an llms.txt file from scratch based on repository structure following the llms.txt specification at https://llmstxt.org/
Is the create-llms skill safe?
Clean: nothing in its files matched our rules. We read 1 file in the folder on 2026-09-28.
No findings.
Install the create-llms skill
A skill is a folder. Copy it into your agent's skills folder and the agent loads it when the task matches its description.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot.git /tmp/awesome-copilot mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills cp -r /tmp/awesome-copilot/skills/create-llms ~/.claude/skills/create-llms
In the Claude apps, zip the folder and upload it from the Skills settings. The folder on GitHub
The instructions your agent would load
SKILL.md as published, without the frontmatter. Read it on GitHub
Create LLMs.txt File from Repository Structure
Create a new llms.txt file from scratch in the root of the repository following the official llms.txt specification at https://llmstxt.org/. This file provides high-level guidance to large language models (LLMs) on where to find relevant content for understanding the repository's purpose and specifications.
Primary Directive
Create a comprehensive llms.txt file that serves as an entry point for LLMs to understand and navigate the repository effectively. The file must comply with the llms.txt specification and be optimized for LLM consumption while remaining human-readable.
Analysis and Planning Phase
Before creating the llms.txt file, you must complete a thorough analysis:
Step 1: Review llms.txt Specification
- Review the official specification at https://llmstxt.org/ to ensure full compliance
- Understand the required format structure and guidelines
- Note the specific markdown structure requirements
Step 2: Repository Structure Analysis
- Examine the complete repository structure using appropriate tools
- Identify the primary purpose and scope of the repository
- Catalog all important directories and their purposes
- List key files that would be valuable for LLM understanding
Step 3: Content Discovery
- Identify README files and their locations
- Find documentation files (.md files in /docs/, /spec/, etc.)
- Locate specification files and their purposes
- Discover configuration files and their relevance
- Find example files and code samples
- Identify any existing documentation structure
Step 4: Create Implementation Plan
Based on your analysis, create a structured plan that includes:
- Repository purpose and scope summary
- Priority-ordered list of essential files for LLM understanding
- Secondary files that provide additional context
- Organizational structure for the llms.txt file
Implementation Requirements
Format Compliance
The llms.txt file must follow this exact structure per the specification:
- H1 Header: Single line with repository/project name (required)
- Blockquote Summary: Brief description in blockquote format (optional but recommended)
- Additional Details: Zero or more markdown sections without headings for context
- File List Sections: Zero or more H2 sections containing markdown lists of links
Content Requirements
Required Elements
- Project Name: Clear, descriptive title as H1
- Summary: Concise blockquote explaining the repository's purpose
- Key Files: Essential files organized by category (H2 sections)
File Link Format
Each file link must follow: descriptive-name: optional description
Section Organization
Organize files into logical H2 sections such as:
- Documentation: Core documentation files
- Specifications: Technical specifications and requirements
- Examples: Sample code and usage examples
- Configuration: Setup and configuration files
- Optional: Secondary files (special meaning - can be skipped for shorter context)
Content Guidelines
Language and Style
- Use concise, clear, unambiguous language
- Avoid jargon without explanation
- Write for both human and LLM readers
- Be specific and informative in descriptions
File Selection Criteria
Include files that:
- Explain the repository's purpose and scope
- Provide essential technical documentation
- Show usage examples and patterns
- Define interfaces and specifications
- Contain configuration and setup instructions
Exclude files that:
- Are purely implementation details
- Contain redundant information
- Are build artifacts or generated content
- Are not relevant to understanding the project
Execution Steps
Step 1: Repository Analysis
- Examine the repository structure completely
- Read the main README.md to understand the project
- Identify all documentation directories and files
- Catalog specification files and their purposes
- Find example files and configuration files
Step 2: Content Planning
- Determine the primary purpose statement
- Write a concise summary for the blockquote
- Group identified files into logical categories
- Prioritize files by importance for LLM understanding
- Create descriptions for each file link
Step 3: File Creation
- Create the llms.txt file in the repository root
- Follow the exact format specification
- Include all required sections
- Use proper markdown formatting
- Ensure all links are valid relative paths
Step 4: Validation
- Verify compliance with https://llmstxt.org/ specification
- Check that all links are valid and accessible
- Ensure the file serves as an effective LLM navigation tool
- Confirm the file is both human and machine readable
Quality Assurance
Format Validation
- ✅ H1 header with project name
- ✅ Blockquote summary (if included)
- ✅ H2 sections for file lists
- ✅ Proper markdown link format
- ✅ No broken or invalid links
- ✅ Consistent formatting throughout
Content Validation
- ✅ Clear, unambiguous language
- ✅ Comprehensive coverage of essential files
- ✅ Logical organization of content
- ✅ Appropriate file descriptions
- ✅ Serves as effective LLM navigation tool
Specification Compliance
- ✅ Follows https://llmstxt.org/ format exactly
- ✅ Uses required markdown structure
- ✅ Implements optional sections appropriately
- ✅ File located at repository root (/llms.txt)
Example Structure Template
# [Repository Name]
> [Concise description of the repository's purpose and scope]
[Optional additional context paragraphs without headings]
## Documentation
- [Main README](README.md): Primary project documentation and getting started guide
- [Contributing Guide](CONTRIBUTING.md): Guidelines for contributing to the project
- [Code of Conduct](CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md): Community guidelines and expectations
## Specifications
- [Technical Specification](spec/technical-spec.md): Detailed technical requirements and constraints
- [API Specification](spec/api-spec.md): Interface definitions and data contracts
## Examples
- [Basic Example](examples/basic-usage.md): Simple usage demonstration
- [Advanced Example](examples/advanced-usage.md): Complex implementation patterns
## Configuration
- [Setup Guide](docs/setup.md): Installation and configuration instructions
- [Deployment Guide](docs/deployment.md): Production deployment guidelines
## Optional
- [Architecture Documentation](docs/architecture.md): Detailed system architecture
- [Design Decisions](docs/decisions.md): Historical design decision recordsSuccess Criteria
The created llms.txt file should:
- Enable LLMs to quickly understand the repository's purpose
- Provide clear navigation to essential documentation
- Follow the official llms.txt specification exactly
- Be comprehensive yet concise
- Serve both human and machine readers effectively
- Include all critical files for project understanding
- Use clear, unambiguous language throughout
- Organize content logically for easy consumption
More skills from github/awesome-copilot
- Aacquire-codebase-knowledgeUse this skill when the user explicitly asks to map, document, or onboard into an existing codebase. Trigger for prompts like "map this codebase", "document this architecture", "onboard me to this repo", or "create codebase docs". Do not trigger for routine feature implementation, bug fixes, or narrow code edits unless the user asks for repository-level discovery.
- Aacreadiness-assessRun the AgentRC readiness assessment on the current repository and produce a static HTML dashboard at reports/index.html. Wraps `npx github:microsoft/agentrc readiness` and hands off rendering to the @ai-readiness-reporter custom agent. Supports policies (--policy) for org-specific scoring. Use when asked to assess, audit, or score the AI readiness of a repo.
- Aacreadiness-generate-instructionsGenerate tailored AI agent instruction files via AgentRC instructions command. Produces .github/copilot-instructions.md (default, recommended for Copilot in VS Code) plus optional per-area .instructions.md files with applyTo globs for monorepos. Use after running /acreadiness-assess to close gaps in the AI Tooling pillar.
- Aacreadiness-policyHelp the user pick, write, or apply an AgentRC policy. Policies customise readiness scoring by disabling irrelevant checks, overriding impact/level, setting pass-rate thresholds, or chaining org baselines with team overrides. Use when the user asks about strict mode, AI-only scoring, custom weights, CI gating, or wants org-wide standardisation.
- Aad-campaign-analyzerUse this skill when the user shares ad campaign performance data and asks what to cut, scale, or test. Trigger for prompts like "analyze my ad campaigns", "where am I wasting ad spend", "reallocate my ad budget", "which ads are actually working", or "ROAS analysis". Do not trigger for campaign planning or creative generation without performance data.
- Aadd-educational-commentsAdd educational comments to the file specified, or prompt asking for file to comment if one is not provided.
- Aadobe-illustrator-scriptingWrite, debug, and optimize Adobe Illustrator automation scripts using ExtendScript (JavaScript/JSX). Use when creating or modifying scripts that manipulate documents, layers, paths, text frames, colors, symbols, artboards, or any Illustrator DOM objects. Covers the complete JavaScript object model, coordinate system, measurement units, export workflows, and scripting best practices.
- Aagent-architectureDesign AI agent architectures through requirements discovery, or audit and diagnose architectural flaws in existing agents. Architecture only; excludes implementation and general code review.
- Aagent-governancePatterns and techniques for adding governance, safety, and trust controls to AI agent systems. Use this skill when: - Building AI agents that call external tools (APIs, databases, file systems) - Implementing policy-based access controls for agent tool usage - Adding semantic intent classification to detect dangerous prompts - Creating trust scoring systems for multi-agent workflows - Building audit trails for agent actions and decisions - Enforcing rate limits, content filters, or tool restrictions on agents - Working with any agent framework (PydanticAI, CrewAI, OpenAI Agents, LangChain, AutoGen)
- Aagent-owasp-complianceCheck any AI agent codebase against the OWASP Agentic Security Initiative (ASI) Top 10 risks. Use this skill when: - Evaluating an agent system's security posture before production deployment - Running a compliance check against OWASP ASI 2026 standards - Mapping existing security controls to the 10 agentic risks - Generating a compliance report for security review or audit - Comparing agent framework security features against the standard - Any request like "is my agent OWASP compliant?", "check ASI compliance", or "agentic security audit"
- Aagent-skill-stackFind, evaluate, and assemble the smallest compatible set of AI Agent Skills for an end-to-end natural-language goal. Use when a user wants Skills for a multi-step workflow, asks which Skills fit a project, needs an installed-Skill audit or conflict check, has low Skill recall, wants indirect helpers such as humanizers or compliance checks, or wants a project-specific Skill Stack with controlled installation. Search local Skills, registries, GitHub, and OpenCLI; compare adoption, verified fit, safety, and overlap. Do not use for locating one known or common Skill; use the generic find-skills workflow.
- Aagent-supply-chainVerify supply chain integrity for AI agent plugins, tools, and dependencies. Use this skill when: - Generating SHA-256 integrity manifests for agent plugins or tool packages - Verifying that installed plugins match their published manifests - Detecting tampered, modified, or untracked files in agent tool directories - Auditing dependency pinning and version policies for agent components - Building provenance chains for agent plugin promotion (dev → staging → production) - Any request like "verify plugin integrity", "generate manifest", "check supply chain", or "sign this plugin"