breakdown-plan skill
Issue Planning and Automation prompt that generates comprehensive project plans with Epic > Feature > Story/Enabler > Test hierarchy, dependencies, priorities, and automated tracking.
Is the breakdown-plan skill safe?
Clean: nothing in its files matched our rules. We read 1 file in the folder on 2026-09-28.
No findings.
Install the breakdown-plan skill
A skill is a folder. Copy it into your agent's skills folder and the agent loads it when the task matches its description.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot.git /tmp/awesome-copilot mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills cp -r /tmp/awesome-copilot/skills/breakdown-plan ~/.claude/skills/breakdown-plan
In the Claude apps, zip the folder and upload it from the Skills settings. The folder on GitHub
The instructions your agent would load
SKILL.md as published, without the frontmatter. Read it on GitHub
GitHub Issue Planning & Project Automation Prompt
Goal
Act as a senior Project Manager and DevOps specialist with expertise in Agile methodology and GitHub project management. Your task is to take the complete set of feature artifacts (PRD, UX design, technical breakdown, testing plan) and generate a comprehensive GitHub project plan with automated issue creation, dependency linking, priority assignment, and Kanban-style tracking.
GitHub Project Management Best Practices
Agile Work Item Hierarchy
- Epic: Large business capability spanning multiple features (milestone level)
- Feature: Deliverable user-facing functionality within an epic
- Story: User-focused requirement that delivers value independently
- Enabler: Technical infrastructure or architectural work supporting stories
- Test: Quality assurance work for validating stories and enablers
- Task: Implementation-level work breakdown for stories/enablers
Project Management Principles
- INVEST Criteria: Independent, Negotiable, Valuable, Estimable, Small, Testable
- Definition of Ready: Clear acceptance criteria before work begins
- Definition of Done: Quality gates and completion criteria
- Dependency Management: Clear blocking relationships and critical path identification
- Value-Based Prioritization: Business value vs. effort matrix for decision making
Input Requirements
Before using this prompt, ensure you have the complete testing workflow artifacts:
Core Feature Documents
- Feature PRD: /docs/ways-of-work/plan/{epic-name}/{feature-name}.md
- Technical Breakdown: /docs/ways-of-work/plan/{epic-name}/{feature-name}/technical-breakdown.md
- Implementation Plan: /docs/ways-of-work/plan/{epic-name}/{feature-name}/implementation-plan.md
Related Planning Prompts
- Test Planning: Use plan-test prompt for comprehensive test strategy, quality assurance planning, and test issue creation
- Architecture Planning: Use plan-epic-arch prompt for system architecture and technical design
- Feature Planning: Use plan-feature-prd prompt for detailed feature requirements and specifications
Output Format
Create two primary deliverables:
- Project Plan: /docs/ways-of-work/plan/{epic-name}/{feature-name}/project-plan.md
- Issue Creation Checklist: /docs/ways-of-work/plan/{epic-name}/{feature-name}/issues-checklist.md
Project Plan Structure
1. Project Overview
- Feature Summary: Brief description and business value
- Success Criteria: Measurable outcomes and KPIs
- Key Milestones: Breakdown of major deliverables without timelines
- Risk Assessment: Potential blockers and mitigation strategies
2. Work Item Hierarchy
graph TD
A[Epic: {Epic Name}] --> B[Feature: {Feature Name}]
B --> C[Story 1: {User Story}]
B --> D[Story 2: {User Story}]
B --> E[Enabler 1: {Technical Work}]
B --> F[Enabler 2: {Infrastructure}]
C --> G[Task: Frontend Implementation]
C --> H[Task: API Integration]
C --> I[Test: E2E Scenarios]
D --> J[Task: Component Development]
D --> K[Task: State Management]
D --> L[Test: Unit Tests]
E --> M[Task: Database Schema]
E --> N[Task: Migration Scripts]
F --> O[Task: CI/CD Pipeline]
F --> P[Task: Monitoring Setup]3. GitHub Issues Breakdown
Epic Issue Template
# Epic: {Epic Name}
## Epic Description
{Epic summary from PRD}
## Business Value
- **Primary Goal**: {Main business objective}
- **Success Metrics**: {KPIs and measurable outcomes}
- **User Impact**: {How users will benefit}
## Epic Acceptance Criteria
- [ ] {High-level requirement 1}
- [ ] {High-level requirement 2}
- [ ] {High-level requirement 3}
## Features in this Epic
- [ ] #{feature-issue-number} - {Feature Name}
## Definition of Done
- [ ] All feature stories completed
- [ ] End-to-end testing passed
- [ ] Performance benchmarks met
- [ ] Documentation updated
- [ ] User acceptance testing completed
## Labels
`epic`, `{priority-level}`, `{value-tier}`
## Milestone
{Release version/date}
## Estimate
{Epic-level t-shirt size: XS, S, M, L, XL, XXL}Feature Issue Template
# Feature: {Feature Name}
## Feature Description
{Feature summary from PRD}
## User Stories in this Feature
- [ ] #{story-issue-number} - {User Story Title}
- [ ] #{story-issue-number} - {User Story Title}
## Technical Enablers
- [ ] #{enabler-issue-number} - {Enabler Title}
- [ ] #{enabler-issue-number} - {Enabler Title}
## Dependencies
**Blocks**: {List of issues this feature blocks}
**Blocked by**: {List of issues blocking this feature}
## Acceptance Criteria
- [ ] {Feature-level requirement 1}
- [ ] {Feature-level requirement 2}
## Definition of Done
- [ ] All user stories delivered
- [ ] Technical enablers completed
- [ ] Integration testing passed
- [ ] UX review approved
- [ ] Performance testing completed
## Labels
`feature`, `{priority-level}`, `{value-tier}`, `{component-name}`
## Epic
#{epic-issue-number}
## Estimate
{Story points or t-shirt size}User Story Issue Template
# User Story: {Story Title}
## Story Statement
As a **{user type}**, I want **{goal}** so that **{benefit}**.
## Acceptance Criteria
- [ ] {Specific testable requirement 1}
- [ ] {Specific testable requirement 2}
- [ ] {Specific testable requirement 3}
## Technical Tasks
- [ ] #{task-issue-number} - {Implementation task}
- [ ] #{task-issue-number} - {Integration task}
## Testing Requirements
- [ ] #{test-issue-number} - {Test implementation}
## Dependencies
**Blocked by**: {Dependencies that must be completed first}
## Definition of Done
- [ ] Acceptance criteria met
- [ ] Code review approved
- [ ] Unit tests written and passing
- [ ] Integration tests passing
- [ ] UX design implemented
- [ ] Accessibility requirements met
## Labels
`user-story`, `{priority-level}`, `frontend/backend/fullstack`, `{component-name}`
## Feature
#{feature-issue-number}
## Estimate
{Story points: 1, 2, 3, 5, 8}Technical Enabler Issue Template
# Technical Enabler: {Enabler Title}
## Enabler Description
{Technical work required to support user stories}
## Technical Requirements
- [ ] {Technical requirement 1}
- [ ] {Technical requirement 2}
## Implementation Tasks
- [ ] #{task-issue-number} - {Implementation detail}
- [ ] #{task-issue-number} - {Infrastructure setup}
## User Stories Enabled
This enabler supports:
- #{story-issue-number} - {Story title}
- #{story-issue-number} - {Story title}
## Acceptance Criteria
- [ ] {Technical validation 1}
- [ ] {Technical validation 2}
- [ ] Performance benchmarks met
## Definition of Done
- [ ] Implementation completed
- [ ] Unit tests written
- [ ] Integration tests passing
- [ ] Documentation updated
- [ ] Code review approved
## Labels
`enabler`, `{priority-level}`, `infrastructure/api/database`, `{component-name}`
## Feature
#{feature-issue-number}
## Estimate
{Story points or effort estimate}4. Priority and Value Matrix
5. Estimation Guidelines
Story Point Scale (Fibonacci)
- 1 point: Simple change, <4 hours
- 2 points: Small feature, <1 day
- 3 points: Medium feature, 1-2 days
- 5 points: Large feature, 3-5 days
- 8 points: Complex feature, 1-2 weeks
- 13+ points: Epic-level work, needs breakdown
T-Shirt Sizing (Epics/Features)
- XS: 1-2 story points total
- S: 3-8 story points total
- M: 8-20 story points total
- L: 20-40 story points total
- XL: 40+ story points total (consider breaking down)
6. Dependency Management
graph LR
A[Epic Planning] --> B[Feature Definition]
B --> C[Enabler Implementation]
C --> D[Story Development]
D --> E[Testing Execution]
E --> F[Feature Delivery]
G[Infrastructure Setup] --> C
H[API Design] --> D
I[Database Schema] --> C
J[Authentication] --> DDependency Types
- Blocks: Work that cannot proceed until this is complete
- Related: Work that shares context but not blocking
- Prerequisite: Required infrastructure or setup work
- Parallel: Work that can proceed simultaneously
7. Sprint Planning Template
Sprint Capacity Planning
- Team Velocity: {Average story points per sprint}
- Sprint Duration: {2-week sprints recommended}
- Buffer Allocation: 20% for unexpected work and bug fixes
- Focus Factor: 70-80% of total time on planned work
Sprint Goal Definition
## Sprint {N} Goal
**Primary Objective**: {Main deliverable for this sprint}
**Stories in Sprint**:
- #{issue} - {Story title} ({points} pts)
- #{issue} - {Story title} ({points} pts)
**Total Commitment**: {points} story points
**Success Criteria**: {Measurable outcomes}8. GitHub Project Board Configuration
Column Structure (Kanban)
- Backlog: Prioritized and ready for planning
- Sprint Ready: Detailed and estimated, ready for development
- In Progress: Currently being worked on
- In Review: Code review, testing, or stakeholder review
- Testing: QA validation and acceptance testing
- Done: Completed and accepted
Custom Fields Configuration
- Priority: P0, P1, P2, P3
- Value: High, Medium, Low
- Component: Frontend, Backend, Infrastructure, Testing
- Estimate: Story points or t-shirt size
- Sprint: Current sprint assignment
- Assignee: Responsible team member
- Epic: Parent epic reference
9. Automation and GitHub Actions
Automated Issue Creation
name: Create Feature Issues
on:
workflow_dispatch:
inputs:
feature_name:
description: 'Feature name'
required: true
epic_issue:
description: 'Epic issue number'
required: true
jobs:
create-issues:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- name: Create Feature Issue
uses: actions/github-script@v7
with:
script: |
const { data: epic } = await github.rest.issues.get({
owner: context.repo.owner,
repo: context.repo.repo,
issue_number: ${{ github.event.inputs.epic_issue }}
});
const featureIssue = await github.rest.issues.create({
owner: context.repo.owner,
repo: context.repo.repo,
title: `Feature: ${{ github.event.inputs.feature_name }}`,
body: `# Feature: ${{ github.event.inputs.feature_name }}\n\n...`,
labels: ['feature', 'priority-medium'],
milestone: epic.data.milestone?.number
});Automated Status Updates
name: Update Issue Status
on:
pull_request:
types: [opened, closed]
jobs:
update-status:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- name: Move to In Review
if: github.event.action == 'opened'
uses: actions/github-script@v7
# Move related issues to "In Review" column
- name: Move to Done
if: github.event.action == 'closed' && github.event.pull_request.merged
uses: actions/github-script@v7
# Move related issues to "Done" columnIssue Creation Checklist
Pre-Creation Preparation
- [ ] Feature artifacts complete: PRD, UX design, technical breakdown, testing plan
- [ ] Epic exists: Parent epic issue created with proper labels and milestone
- [ ] Project board configured: Columns, custom fields, and automation rules set up
- [ ] Team capacity assessed: Sprint planning and resource allocation completed
Epic Level Issues
More skills from github/awesome-copilot
- Aacquire-codebase-knowledgeUse this skill when the user explicitly asks to map, document, or onboard into an existing codebase. Trigger for prompts like "map this codebase", "document this architecture", "onboard me to this repo", or "create codebase docs". Do not trigger for routine feature implementation, bug fixes, or narrow code edits unless the user asks for repository-level discovery.
- Aacreadiness-assessRun the AgentRC readiness assessment on the current repository and produce a static HTML dashboard at reports/index.html. Wraps `npx github:microsoft/agentrc readiness` and hands off rendering to the @ai-readiness-reporter custom agent. Supports policies (--policy) for org-specific scoring. Use when asked to assess, audit, or score the AI readiness of a repo.
- Aacreadiness-generate-instructionsGenerate tailored AI agent instruction files via AgentRC instructions command. Produces .github/copilot-instructions.md (default, recommended for Copilot in VS Code) plus optional per-area .instructions.md files with applyTo globs for monorepos. Use after running /acreadiness-assess to close gaps in the AI Tooling pillar.
- Aacreadiness-policyHelp the user pick, write, or apply an AgentRC policy. Policies customise readiness scoring by disabling irrelevant checks, overriding impact/level, setting pass-rate thresholds, or chaining org baselines with team overrides. Use when the user asks about strict mode, AI-only scoring, custom weights, CI gating, or wants org-wide standardisation.
- Aad-campaign-analyzerUse this skill when the user shares ad campaign performance data and asks what to cut, scale, or test. Trigger for prompts like "analyze my ad campaigns", "where am I wasting ad spend", "reallocate my ad budget", "which ads are actually working", or "ROAS analysis". Do not trigger for campaign planning or creative generation without performance data.
- Aadd-educational-commentsAdd educational comments to the file specified, or prompt asking for file to comment if one is not provided.
- Aadobe-illustrator-scriptingWrite, debug, and optimize Adobe Illustrator automation scripts using ExtendScript (JavaScript/JSX). Use when creating or modifying scripts that manipulate documents, layers, paths, text frames, colors, symbols, artboards, or any Illustrator DOM objects. Covers the complete JavaScript object model, coordinate system, measurement units, export workflows, and scripting best practices.
- Aagent-architectureDesign AI agent architectures through requirements discovery, or audit and diagnose architectural flaws in existing agents. Architecture only; excludes implementation and general code review.
- Aagent-governancePatterns and techniques for adding governance, safety, and trust controls to AI agent systems. Use this skill when: - Building AI agents that call external tools (APIs, databases, file systems) - Implementing policy-based access controls for agent tool usage - Adding semantic intent classification to detect dangerous prompts - Creating trust scoring systems for multi-agent workflows - Building audit trails for agent actions and decisions - Enforcing rate limits, content filters, or tool restrictions on agents - Working with any agent framework (PydanticAI, CrewAI, OpenAI Agents, LangChain, AutoGen)
- Aagent-owasp-complianceCheck any AI agent codebase against the OWASP Agentic Security Initiative (ASI) Top 10 risks. Use this skill when: - Evaluating an agent system's security posture before production deployment - Running a compliance check against OWASP ASI 2026 standards - Mapping existing security controls to the 10 agentic risks - Generating a compliance report for security review or audit - Comparing agent framework security features against the standard - Any request like "is my agent OWASP compliant?", "check ASI compliance", or "agentic security audit"
- Aagent-skill-stackFind, evaluate, and assemble the smallest compatible set of AI Agent Skills for an end-to-end natural-language goal. Use when a user wants Skills for a multi-step workflow, asks which Skills fit a project, needs an installed-Skill audit or conflict check, has low Skill recall, wants indirect helpers such as humanizers or compliance checks, or wants a project-specific Skill Stack with controlled installation. Search local Skills, registries, GitHub, and OpenCLI; compare adoption, verified fit, safety, and overlap. Do not use for locating one known or common Skill; use the generic find-skills workflow.
- Aagent-supply-chainVerify supply chain integrity for AI agent plugins, tools, and dependencies. Use this skill when: - Generating SHA-256 integrity manifests for agent plugins or tool packages - Verifying that installed plugins match their published manifests - Detecting tampered, modified, or untracked files in agent tool directories - Auditing dependency pinning and version policies for agent components - Building provenance chains for agent plugin promotion (dev → staging → production) - Any request like "verify plugin integrity", "generate manifest", "check supply chain", or "sign this plugin"