pi-delegate skill
Delegate a coding task to the Pi coding agent CLI (`pi`) as a background implementer, then review its diff and land it yourself. Use this whenever the user wants to delegate implementation work to Pi - phrasings like "have Pi implement X", "delegate this to pi", "run it through Pi", or "use pi to implement/fix/refactor" - or wants to run a queue of coding tasks through Pi while staying the reviewer. DO NOT USE for tasks small enough to do inline, or when the user wants the code written directly without delegating.
Is the pi-delegate skill safe?
Clean: nothing in its files matched our rules. We read 6 files in the folder on 2026-09-28.
No findings.
Install the pi-delegate skill
A skill is a folder. Copy it into your agent's skills folder and the agent loads it when the task matches its description.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/amElnagdy/delegate-skills.git /tmp/delegate-skills mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills cp -r /tmp/delegate-skills/skills/pi-delegate ~/.claude/skills/pi-delegate
In the Claude apps, zip the folder and upload it from the Skills settings. The folder on GitHub
The instructions your agent would load
SKILL.md as published, without the frontmatter. Read it on GitHub
Pi Delegate
You are the orchestrator. Delegate a bounded coding task to a separate implementer - the Pi coding agent CLI - then review what it produced and land it yourself. You write the brief and own the judgment; the implementer makes changes in its own session; you verify and commit.
The loop needs only a shell command and file access, so any comparable orchestrator can drive it.
When NOT to use this
restricts the tool surface, but a write-capable run executes without prompts.
- The task is small enough to do inline; delegation overhead is not worth it.
- The pi CLI is not installed or authenticated.
- You need a sandboxed implementer. Pi has no sandbox and no permission modes; --read-only
Prerequisites (check once)
variable / pi's auth file for an API-key provider.
- Install pi with npm install -g @earendil-works/pi-coding-agent.
- Authenticate: /login inside pi for a subscription provider, or an API-key environment
- Confirm pi --version succeeds.
- Work in, or point --cd at, the target git repository.
Choose the model (optional)
Omit --model to use pi's configured default. To pick another, choose from pi --list-models and pass an explicit id or pattern like / or sonnet:high. The relay accepts letters, digits, and . : / - only (the value reaches a shell on Windows), so glob patterns with are not forwarded.
The loop
Run these five steps per task. Steps 1, 4, and 5 require judgment; 2 and 3 are mechanical.
1. Write the brief
Pi sees only the text you send plus what it can inspect in the workspace - no chat history or shared context. Include the goal, current state, what to change, what to leave untouched, the project's actual gates, and a report contract. Tell pi not to commit. Keep one task per brief. Pi auto-loads AGENTS.md/CLAUDE.md context files from the workspace and its parents, so repo instructions reach it without inlining. See references/writing-the-brief.md.
2. Dispatch
Use the bundled relay. It pipes the brief to pi --mode json on stdin, captures the JSON event stream, and writes result.json. ( is the installed folder containing this SKILL.md.)
node "<skill-dir>/scripts/relay.mjs" --brief brief.txt --cd /path/to/repo
# choose a model: add --model <id from pi --list-models>
# choose a provider: add --provider <name>
# read-only run (review/diagnosis): add --read-only
# trust project .pi resources: add --approve
# resume the most recent session: add --resume-last (delta brief only)
# resume a specific session: add --session <id> (delta brief only)
# hard time limit (watchdog): add --timeout 2h (the 30m default suits short runs; implementation briefs routinely need 1-2h)
# see all options: node .../relay.mjs --helpThe child process's cwd pins the workspace. The relay writes artifacts under the system temp dir by default and never commits. See references/dispatch-and-poll.md.
3. Wait for completion
The relay blocks until pi finishes. Run it with the orchestrator's background-command facility, or background it in the shell and poll for result.json. A pre-run usage error exits 2 and writes no result; a missing pi exits 127 and writes status: "pi_unavailable".
Trust process state and the working tree over a progress display. Completion means the process exited and result.json exists. Pi's full report is the finalMessage field in result.json (also printed in full on stdout between the report markers).
4. Review - do not trust the self-report
Treat pi's final message and gate claims as claims:
- Re-run the project's gates yourself.
- Read the diff against the brief, starting with touchedFiles.
- Run relevant guard skills if installed.
- Round-trip migrations and grep for dangling references after removals or renames.
See references/review-and-land.md.
5. Land it
The implementer edits the working tree; the orchestrator commits. Commit only after the gates pass and the diff holds. If rework is needed, send a delta brief with --resume-last or --session , then review again.
Autonomy and permissions
Pi has no sandbox and no permission modes. A default headless run reads, writes, edits, and executes shell commands with no prompts - the controls are:
extension, and custom tools. Installed extension code still runs with the user's host permissions.
- --read-only restricts pi's callable tools to --tools read,grep,find,ls across built-in,
stay untrusted. --approve is the explicit opt-in for a repository the user trusts.
- The relay passes --no-approve by default, so project .pi settings, extensions, and skills
- touchedFiles and the diff are the record of what changed. Inspect them after every run.
Authorization model
Delegation is something the human opts into. Once they have ("run this queue", "proceed"), committing verified, gate-passing work is the agreed contract. Two limits remain: surface, don't absorb (report pi's design decisions, defensible-but-unasked turns, and non-blocking nitpicks) and stop for scope changes (if correct completion needs going beyond the brief, ask instead of expanding the mandate). See references/review-and-land.md.
References
real gates, stdin delivery, and delta briefs.
- references/writing-the-brief.md - structure, report contract,
result.json, polling, and failure recovery.
- references/dispatch-and-poll.md - flags, artifacts,
boundary, and rework through pi sessions.
- references/review-and-land.md - review checklist, commit
constraint carry-forward, progress tracking, and the final coherence pass.
- references/multi-task-queues.md - sequential queues,
More skills from amElnagdy/delegate-skills
- Aagy-delegateDelegate a coding task to the Google Antigravity CLI (`agy`) as a background implementer, then review its diff and land it yourself. Use this whenever the user wants to hand implementation work to Antigravity or agy - phrasings like "have Antigravity do X", "delegate this to agy", "run it through agy", or "use Antigravity to implement/fix/refactor" - or wants to run a queue of coding tasks through agy while staying the reviewer. DO NOT USE for tasks small enough to do inline, or when the user wants the code written directly without delegating.
- Aaider-delegateDelegate a coding task to Aider (`aider`) as a background implementer, then review its diff and land it yourself. Use this whenever the user wants to hand implementation work to Aider - phrasings like "have Aider do X", "delegate this to aider", "run it through Aider", or "use Aider to implement/fix/refactor" - or wants to run a queue of coding tasks through Aider while staying the reviewer. This includes asking Aider to drive a local or self-hosted OpenAI-compatible endpoint ("have Aider use my local model", "run Aider against llama.cpp / Ollama / vLLM / LM Studio"), which Aider reaches via `--api-base`. DO NOT USE for local-model or coding requests that do not name Aider, for tasks small enough to do inline, or when the user wants the code written directly without delegating.
- Aclaude-delegateDelegate a coding task to a separate Claude Code CLI process or another Claude session as an implementer, then review its diff and land it yourself. Use only when the user explicitly asks to delegate implementation to Claude Code, another Claude session, or the `claude` CLI — for example, "have another Claude implement this", "delegate this to Claude Code", or "run this queue through a separate Claude session." Do not trigger merely because the current orchestrator is Claude, and do not use when the user asks the current Claude to implement directly without delegation.
- Acline-delegateDelegate a coding task to the Cline coding agent CLI (`cline`) as a background implementer, then review its diff and land it yourself. Use this whenever the user wants to delegate implementation work to Cline - phrasings like "have Cline implement X", "delegate this to cline", "run it through Cline", or "use cline to implement/fix/refactor" - or wants to run a queue of coding tasks through Cline while staying the reviewer. DO NOT USE for tasks small enough to do inline, or when the user wants the code written directly without delegating.
- Acodex-delegateDelegate a coding task to the OpenAI Codex CLI as a background implementer, then review its diff and land it yourself. Use this whenever the user wants to hand implementation work to Codex — phrasings like "have Codex do X", "delegate this to Codex", "run it through Codex", or "use Codex to implement/fix/refactor" — or to run a queue of coding tasks through Codex while staying the reviewer. Prefer it over a one-shot Codex forwarder (such as the codex-rescue agent) when the user will review the diff and commit it themselves. DO NOT USE for tasks small enough to do inline, or when the user wants the code written directly without delegating.
- Acommandcode-delegateDelegate a coding task to the Command Code CLI (`cmd`) as a background implementer, then review its diff and land it yourself. Use this whenever the user wants to hand implementation work to Command Code — phrasings like "have Command Code do X", "delegate this to commandcode", "run it through cmd", or "use Command Code to implement/fix/refactor" — or to run a queue of coding tasks through Command Code while staying the reviewer. DO NOT USE for tasks small enough to do inline, or when the user wants the code written directly without delegating.
- Acopilot-delegateDelegate a coding task to the GitHub Copilot CLI (`copilot`) as a background implementer, then review its diff and land it yourself. Use this whenever the user wants to delegate implementation work to Copilot - phrasings like "have Copilot implement X", "delegate this to copilot", "run it through Copilot CLI", or "use copilot to implement/fix/refactor" - or wants to run a queue of coding tasks through Copilot while staying the reviewer. DO NOT USE for tasks small enough to do inline, or when the user wants the code written directly without delegating.
- Acursor-delegateDelegate a coding task to the Cursor Agent CLI (`cursor-agent`) as a background implementer, then review its diff and land it yourself. Use this whenever the user wants to hand implementation work to Cursor — phrasings like "have Cursor implement X", "delegate this to Cursor", "run it through Cursor Agent", or "use Cursor to implement/fix/refactor" — or wants to run a queue of coding tasks through Cursor while staying the reviewer. DO NOT USE for tasks small enough to do inline, or when the user wants the code written directly without delegating.
- Adelegate-setupConfigure delegation fleet lanes: which implementer CLI handles which kind of work, with optional model and effort (or variant) dials. Discovers installed CLIs, proposes a lane map for user approval, and writes global or project config only after explicit yes. Use when the user asks to set up, configure, or reconfigure delegation lanes, a fleet of lanes, or which implementer handles feature/tests/ui work — not for dispatching a coding task to an implementer.
- Agrok-delegateDelegate a coding task to the Grok Build CLI as a background implementer, then review its diff and land it yourself. Use this whenever the user wants to hand implementation work to Grok — phrasings like "have Grok do X", "delegate this to Grok", "run it through Grok", "use Grok Build to implement/fix/refactor", or "have grok CLI do this" — or to run a queue of coding tasks through Grok while staying the reviewer. Prefer it when the user will review the diff and commit it themselves. DO NOT USE for tasks small enough to do inline, or when the user wants the code written directly without delegating.
- Akimi-delegateDelegate a coding task to the Kimi Code CLI (`kimi`) as a background implementer, then review its diff and land it yourself. Use this whenever the user wants to hand implementation work to Kimi - phrasings like "have Kimi implement X", "delegate this to Kimi", "run it through Kimi Code", or "use Kimi to implement/fix/refactor" - or wants to run a queue of coding tasks through Kimi while staying the reviewer. DO NOT USE for tasks small enough to do inline, or when the user wants the code written directly without delegating.
- Aomp-delegateDelegate a coding task to Oh My Pi (`omp`) as a background implementer, then review its diff and land it yourself. Use this whenever the user wants to delegate implementation work to Oh My Pi / omp - phrasings like "have omp implement X", "delegate this to oh my pi", "run it through omp", "use oh-my-pi to implement/fix/refactor" - or wants to run a queue of coding tasks through omp while staying the reviewer. DO NOT USE for tasks small enough to do inline, when the user wants the code written directly without delegating, or when they mean the original Pi CLI (`pi`) — that is pi-delegate.