agy-delegate skill
Delegate a coding task to the Google Antigravity CLI (`agy`) as a background implementer, then review its diff and land it yourself. Use this whenever the user wants to hand implementation work to Antigravity or agy - phrasings like "have Antigravity do X", "delegate this to agy", "run it through agy", or "use Antigravity to implement/fix/refactor" - or wants to run a queue of coding tasks through agy while staying the reviewer. DO NOT USE for tasks small enough to do inline, or when the user wants the code written directly without delegating.
Is the agy-delegate skill safe?
Clean: nothing in its files matched our rules. We read 6 files in the folder on 2026-09-28.
No findings.
Install the agy-delegate skill
A skill is a folder. Copy it into your agent's skills folder and the agent loads it when the task matches its description.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/amElnagdy/delegate-skills.git /tmp/delegate-skills mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills cp -r /tmp/delegate-skills/skills/agy-delegate ~/.claude/skills/agy-delegate
In the Claude apps, zip the folder and upload it from the Skills settings. The folder on GitHub
The instructions your agent would load
SKILL.md as published, without the frontmatter. Read it on GitHub
Antigravity Delegate
You are the orchestrator. This skill lets you hand a bounded coding task to a separate implementer - the Google Antigravity CLI (agy) - then review what it produced and land it yourself. You write the brief and own the judgment; Antigravity does the typing in its own conversation; you verify and commit.
Nothing here is specific to one orchestrating agent. The loop needs only the ability to run a shell command and read a file, so any comparable agent can drive it. It is designed for and run on Claude Code; treat other orchestrators as designed-for, not yet proven.
When NOT to use this
the first-launch setup.
- The task is small enough to just do inline - delegation overhead is not worth it.
- The agy CLI is not installed or not authenticated. Install it from Antigravity's CLI docs and run
--read-only dispatch covers review without edits, but a plain review may not need delegation at all).
- You want to write the code yourself, or you only need Antigravity's opinion on code you wrote (a
Prerequisites (check once)
- agy help succeeds. If not, install the Antigravity CLI and complete first-launch setup.
- agy models succeeds. That proves the CLI can authenticate and list the available model labels.
- You are in (or will point --cd at) the target git repository.
These checks do not prove that a headless write will be approved. In --print mode, Antigravity cannot prompt for a write permission and may auto-deny it. The relay detects that denial instead of reporting completion.
Choose the implementer model
agy has a configured default model, so --model is optional. Use it when the human has a preferred Antigravity model label for the task. Otherwise let Antigravity use its own current default rather than guessing.
The loop
Run these five steps per task. Steps 1, 4, and 5 are your judgment; 2 and 3 are mechanical.
1. Write the brief
Antigravity sees only the text you send plus what it can inspect in the workspace - no chat history, no shared context. Everything the task needs goes in the brief: the goal, the current state, what to change, what to leave untouched, the project's actual gate commands, and a report contract. Tell Antigravity it will not commit (you will). Keep one task per brief. Full guidance and a template: references/writing-the-brief.md.
2. Dispatch
Send the brief to Antigravity with the bundled helper. It wraps agy --print, captures the run, and writes a structured result.json - so your only job is "run a command, read a file." ( below is this skill's installed directory - the folder containing this SKILL.md.)
node "<skill-dir>/scripts/relay.mjs" --brief brief.txt --cd /path/to/repo
# choose a model label: add --model "<label from agy models>"
# reasoning effort (low, medium, high): add --effort high
# read-only (sandbox — no edits): add --read-only
# enable Antigravity terminal sandbox: add --sandbox
# resume the most recent conversation: add --resume-last (delta brief only)
# see all options: node .../relay.mjs --helpThe helper starts a fresh Antigravity project by default and passes --add-dir (the --cd path, absolute) so agy has an explicit workspace. It does not pass --dangerously-skip-permissions by default. Mechanics, flags, and the result.json shape: references/dispatch-and-poll.md.
3. Wait for completion
The helper blocks until Antigravity finishes, so back it with whatever your orchestrator offers and resume when it returns:
the result file.
- Claude Code: run the Bash call with runinbackground: true; you are notified on completion.
- Plain shell / other agents: run it in the foreground for short tasks, or background it and poll
Do not trust progress trackers over reality: a run is finished when result.json is written and the process has exited. Read the working tree, not a status line. The implementer's full report is the finalMessage field in result.json (also printed in full on stdout between the report markers).
4. Review - do not trust the self-report
Antigravity's result.json includes its own final message and any gate claims. Re-verify, don't accept:
touchedFiles in the result is your starting point.
- Re-run the project's gates yourself (the test/lint/build commands from step 1).
- Read the diff against the brief: did Antigravity do what was asked, nothing more and nothing less?
- Run the relevant guard skills on the diff if you have them installed.
- For schema/migration changes, round-trip them; for removals, grep for dangling references.
Full checklist: references/review-and-land.md.
5. Land it
The implementer edits the working tree; the orchestrator commits. Only after the gates pass and the diff holds:
- Commit the verified work yourself, with a clear message.
- If it needs changes, send a delta brief with --resume-last and review again.
Permission model
Antigravity owns its own permission policy. The relay does not bypass it by default. Use --dangerously-skip-permissions only when the human explicitly accepts that Antigravity may auto-approve tool permission requests. --read-only composes --sandbox with --dangerously-skip-permissions: the sandbox is the enforcement — writes inside the workspace are overlaid and discarded, and paths outside it fail with EPERM — while the auto-approve only lets tools run inside it. As a user-facing flag it stays mutually exclusive with --dangerously-skip-permissions, which alone (without the sandbox) is full access. Use --sandbox on its own when you want the terminal sandbox enabled for a write run. If headless --print auto-denies a write, the relay reports status: "failed" and exits non-zero. The relay fingerprints the working tree before and after a --read-only run to report readOnlyViolation in result.json. Settings allow-rules do apply to headless --print runs, but their matching rules and config location vary by agy version and platform, so treat a denial as something to measure on your install rather than assume. Two traps have been measured. First, exact-match behavior: on Windows with agy 1.2.5, command() matched only a bare command with no arguments — command(git) never allowed a real git status, and command(regex:git .+) was required (issue #614 comment). On macOS with agy 1.2.0, that same bare command(git) rule did allow git status, so the exact-match trap is not a constant across versions. Second, on Windows, an open upstream defect in Antigravity's permission engine (issue #614) splits resolved paths on whitespace, so a binary under C:\Program Files\... — which is where git itself commonly lives, making this the single most common trigger for delegated coding tasks, not just node/npm — is matched as its first fragment and no command() rule can match it. On which file agy reads: verified live on Windows with agy 1.2.5, the effective rules were userSettings.globalPermissionGrants.allow in ~/.gemini/config/config.json, not the permissions.allow in ~/.gemini/antigravity-cli/settings.json that agy's own denial message points at; verified live on macOS with agy 1.2.0, rules in antigravity-cli/settings.json took effect. Recheck both on your version before relying on either file. See references/dispatch-and-poll.md for the full writeup. Do not add the bypass flag without explicit human approval.
Authorization model
Delegation is something the human opts into. Once they have ("run this queue", "proceed"), committing verified, gate-passing work is the agreed contract. Two limits on that mandate: surface, don't absorb (report Antigravity's design decisions, defensible-but-unasked turns, and non-blocking nitpicks rather than silently keeping them) and stop for scope changes (if correct completion needs going beyond the brief, ask - don't expand the mandate yourself). The full treatment is in references/review-and-land.md.
References
can execute blind: structure, XML blocks, the report contract, and real gate commands.
- references/writing-the-brief.md - how to write a brief Antigravity
result.json contract, backgrounding per orchestrator, and recovery when a run misbehaves.
- references/dispatch-and-poll.md - relay.mjs flags, the
boundary, and the rework cycle via --resume-last.
- references/review-and-land.md - the review checklist, the commit
carrying constraints forward, progress tracking, and the end-of-run coherence check.
- references/multi-task-queues.md - running a sequential queue:
More skills from amElnagdy/delegate-skills
- Aaider-delegateDelegate a coding task to Aider (`aider`) as a background implementer, then review its diff and land it yourself. Use this whenever the user wants to hand implementation work to Aider - phrasings like "have Aider do X", "delegate this to aider", "run it through Aider", or "use Aider to implement/fix/refactor" - or wants to run a queue of coding tasks through Aider while staying the reviewer. This includes asking Aider to drive a local or self-hosted OpenAI-compatible endpoint ("have Aider use my local model", "run Aider against llama.cpp / Ollama / vLLM / LM Studio"), which Aider reaches via `--api-base`. DO NOT USE for local-model or coding requests that do not name Aider, for tasks small enough to do inline, or when the user wants the code written directly without delegating.
- Aclaude-delegateDelegate a coding task to a separate Claude Code CLI process or another Claude session as an implementer, then review its diff and land it yourself. Use only when the user explicitly asks to delegate implementation to Claude Code, another Claude session, or the `claude` CLI — for example, "have another Claude implement this", "delegate this to Claude Code", or "run this queue through a separate Claude session." Do not trigger merely because the current orchestrator is Claude, and do not use when the user asks the current Claude to implement directly without delegation.
- Acline-delegateDelegate a coding task to the Cline coding agent CLI (`cline`) as a background implementer, then review its diff and land it yourself. Use this whenever the user wants to delegate implementation work to Cline - phrasings like "have Cline implement X", "delegate this to cline", "run it through Cline", or "use cline to implement/fix/refactor" - or wants to run a queue of coding tasks through Cline while staying the reviewer. DO NOT USE for tasks small enough to do inline, or when the user wants the code written directly without delegating.
- Acodex-delegateDelegate a coding task to the OpenAI Codex CLI as a background implementer, then review its diff and land it yourself. Use this whenever the user wants to hand implementation work to Codex — phrasings like "have Codex do X", "delegate this to Codex", "run it through Codex", or "use Codex to implement/fix/refactor" — or to run a queue of coding tasks through Codex while staying the reviewer. Prefer it over a one-shot Codex forwarder (such as the codex-rescue agent) when the user will review the diff and commit it themselves. DO NOT USE for tasks small enough to do inline, or when the user wants the code written directly without delegating.
- Acommandcode-delegateDelegate a coding task to the Command Code CLI (`cmd`) as a background implementer, then review its diff and land it yourself. Use this whenever the user wants to hand implementation work to Command Code — phrasings like "have Command Code do X", "delegate this to commandcode", "run it through cmd", or "use Command Code to implement/fix/refactor" — or to run a queue of coding tasks through Command Code while staying the reviewer. DO NOT USE for tasks small enough to do inline, or when the user wants the code written directly without delegating.
- Acopilot-delegateDelegate a coding task to the GitHub Copilot CLI (`copilot`) as a background implementer, then review its diff and land it yourself. Use this whenever the user wants to delegate implementation work to Copilot - phrasings like "have Copilot implement X", "delegate this to copilot", "run it through Copilot CLI", or "use copilot to implement/fix/refactor" - or wants to run a queue of coding tasks through Copilot while staying the reviewer. DO NOT USE for tasks small enough to do inline, or when the user wants the code written directly without delegating.
- Acursor-delegateDelegate a coding task to the Cursor Agent CLI (`cursor-agent`) as a background implementer, then review its diff and land it yourself. Use this whenever the user wants to hand implementation work to Cursor — phrasings like "have Cursor implement X", "delegate this to Cursor", "run it through Cursor Agent", or "use Cursor to implement/fix/refactor" — or wants to run a queue of coding tasks through Cursor while staying the reviewer. DO NOT USE for tasks small enough to do inline, or when the user wants the code written directly without delegating.
- Adelegate-setupConfigure delegation fleet lanes: which implementer CLI handles which kind of work, with optional model and effort (or variant) dials. Discovers installed CLIs, proposes a lane map for user approval, and writes global or project config only after explicit yes. Use when the user asks to set up, configure, or reconfigure delegation lanes, a fleet of lanes, or which implementer handles feature/tests/ui work — not for dispatching a coding task to an implementer.
- Agrok-delegateDelegate a coding task to the Grok Build CLI as a background implementer, then review its diff and land it yourself. Use this whenever the user wants to hand implementation work to Grok — phrasings like "have Grok do X", "delegate this to Grok", "run it through Grok", "use Grok Build to implement/fix/refactor", or "have grok CLI do this" — or to run a queue of coding tasks through Grok while staying the reviewer. Prefer it when the user will review the diff and commit it themselves. DO NOT USE for tasks small enough to do inline, or when the user wants the code written directly without delegating.
- Akimi-delegateDelegate a coding task to the Kimi Code CLI (`kimi`) as a background implementer, then review its diff and land it yourself. Use this whenever the user wants to hand implementation work to Kimi - phrasings like "have Kimi implement X", "delegate this to Kimi", "run it through Kimi Code", or "use Kimi to implement/fix/refactor" - or wants to run a queue of coding tasks through Kimi while staying the reviewer. DO NOT USE for tasks small enough to do inline, or when the user wants the code written directly without delegating.
- Aomp-delegateDelegate a coding task to Oh My Pi (`omp`) as a background implementer, then review its diff and land it yourself. Use this whenever the user wants to delegate implementation work to Oh My Pi / omp - phrasings like "have omp implement X", "delegate this to oh my pi", "run it through omp", "use oh-my-pi to implement/fix/refactor" - or wants to run a queue of coding tasks through omp while staying the reviewer. DO NOT USE for tasks small enough to do inline, when the user wants the code written directly without delegating, or when they mean the original Pi CLI (`pi`) — that is pi-delegate.
- Aopencode-delegateDelegate a coding task to the OpenCode CLI as a background implementer, then review its diff and land it yourself. Use this whenever the user wants to hand implementation work to OpenCode — phrasings like "have OpenCode do X", "delegate this to OpenCode", "run it through OpenCode", or "use OpenCode to implement/fix/refactor" — or wants to run a queue of coding tasks through OpenCode while staying the reviewer. Prefer it when the user will review the diff and commit it themselves. DO NOT USE for tasks small enough to do inline, or when the user wants the code written directly without delegating.