Mmcp.market

codex-delegate skill

by amElnagdy·amElnagdy/delegate-skills·2.2k stars·MIT

Delegate a coding task to the OpenAI Codex CLI as a background implementer, then review its diff and land it yourself. Use this whenever the user wants to hand implementation work to Codex — phrasings like "have Codex do X", "delegate this to Codex", "run it through Codex", or "use Codex to implement/fix/refactor" — or to run a queue of coding tasks through Codex while staying the reviewer. Prefer it over a one-shot Codex forwarder (such as the codex-rescue agent) when the user will review the diff and commit it themselves. DO NOT USE for tasks small enough to do inline, or when the user wants the code written directly without delegating.

A100/100content scan

Is the codex-delegate skill safe?

Clean: nothing in its files matched our rules. We read 6 files in the folder on 2026-09-28.

No findings.

Install the codex-delegate skill

A skill is a folder. Copy it into your agent's skills folder and the agent loads it when the task matches its description.

git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/amElnagdy/delegate-skills.git /tmp/delegate-skills
mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills
cp -r /tmp/delegate-skills/skills/codex-delegate ~/.claude/skills/codex-delegate
available in every project

In the Claude apps, zip the folder and upload it from the Skills settings. The folder on GitHub

The instructions your agent would load

SKILL.md as published, without the frontmatter. Read it on GitHub

Codex Delegate

You are the orchestrator. This skill lets you hand a bounded coding task to a separate implementer — the OpenAI Codex CLI — then review what it produced and land it yourself. You write the brief and own the judgment; Codex does the typing in its own sandbox; you verify and commit.

Nothing here is specific to one orchestrating agent. The loop needs only the ability to run a shell command and read a file, so it works the same whether you are Claude Code, OpenCode with a selected model, or any comparable agent. (It is designed for and run on Claude Code; treat other orchestrators as designed-for, not yet proven.)

When NOT to use this

  • The task is small enough to just do inline — delegation overhead is not worth it.
  • The codex CLI is not installed or not authenticated (run codex login).
  • You want to write the code yourself, or you only need a review (use Codex's own review command).

Prerequisites (check once)

a stale Homebrew one). command -v codex shows the active one and codex --version its version — an old binary predates flags this skill relies on (codex exec --json, -o, exec resume). The relay also records the version it ran into result.json, so a stale binary is visible after the fact.

  1. codex --version succeeds. If not, install (npm i -g @openai/codex) and codex login.
  2. Confirm which codex is on PATH. Multiple installs are common (e.g. a current npm/nvm copy and
  1. You are in (or will point --cd at) the target git repository.

The loop

Run these five steps per task. Steps 1, 4, and 5 are your judgment; 2 and 3 are mechanical.

1. Write the brief

Codex sees only the text you send — no repo memory, no chat history, no shared context. Everything the task needs goes in the brief: the goal, the current state, what to change, what to leave untouched, the project's actual gate commands (discover them from the repo's CLAUDE.md/AGENTS.md/Makefile — do not assume), and a report contract. Tell Codex it will not commit (you will). Keep one task per brief. Full guidance and a template: references/writing-the-brief.md.

2. Dispatch

Send the brief to Codex with the bundled helper. It wraps codex exec, captures the run, and writes a structured result.json — so your only job is "run a command, read a file." ( below is this skill's installed directory — the folder containing this SKILL.md, i.e. the directory you loaded the skill from. Claude Code prints it as "Base directory for this skill" when the skill loads; on other orchestrators use that same directory — if unsure where it landed, run find ~ -name relay.mjs -path 'codex-delegate' and substitute the directory above it.)

node "<skill-dir>/scripts/relay.mjs" --brief brief.txt --cd /path/to/repo
# read-only (review/diagnosis, no edits):   add --read-only
# isolated review (skip ambient MCP/user config): add --ignore-user-config
# continue the exact Codex session:         add --session <threadId>  (from result.json; send only the delta brief)
# fallback when no thread id is available:  add --resume-last
# hard time limit (watchdog):               add --timeout 2h  (default: off; implementation runs routinely need 1-2h)
# see all options:                          node .../relay.mjs --help

The helper defaults to a write-capable (workspace-write) sandbox and writes its artifacts to a temp dir, so the repo under review stays clean. It never commits — see step 5. Mechanics, flags, and the result.json shape: references/dispatch-and-poll.md.

3. Wait for completion

The helper blocks until Codex finishes, so back it with whatever your orchestrator offers and resume when it returns:

the result file — … & in bash/zsh (including Git Bash/WSL), or your shell's equivalent (Start-Job in PowerShell, start /b in cmd). The run is done when result.json exists with a status. (A pre-run usage error — bad args or an empty brief — instead exits with code 2 and a stderr message and writes no result file, so check the exit code too. A missing codex binary exits 127 but does write a result.json with status codex_unavailable.)

  • Claude Code: run the Bash call with runinbackground: true; you are notified on completion.
  • Plain shell / other agents: run it in the foreground for short tasks, or background it and poll

Do not trust progress trackers over reality: a run is finished when result.json is written and the process has exited. Read the working tree, not a status line. The implementer's full report is the finalMessage field in result.json (also printed in full on stdout between the report markers).

4. Review — do not trust the self-report

Codex's result.json includes its own summary and gate claims. Re-verify, don't accept:

"gates passed" on faith.

  • Re-run the project's gates yourself (the test/lint/build commands from step 1). Never take

nothing less? touchedFiles in the result is your starting point.

  • Read the diff against the brief: did Codex do what was asked, nothing more (scope creep) and

test-guard, etc. from guard-skills) — this skill produces the work; those skills judge it.

  • Run the relevant guard skills on the diff if you have them installed (clean-code-guard,
  • For schema/migration changes, round-trip them; for removals, grep for dangling references.

Full checklist: references/review-and-land.md.

5. Land it

Because Codex's sandbox cannot reliably write .git (it varies by version, OS, and path), the orchestrator commits. Only after the gates pass and the diff holds:

(use --resume-last only when no thread id is available), and review again.

  • Commit the verified work yourself, with a clear message.
  • If it needs changes, send a delta brief with --session from the prior result.json

Read-only second opinions

The relay doubles as a clean way to get an adversarial second opinion with no write risk: dispatch --read-only with a brief that lists the agreed points, then each contested point with both positions, and ask Codex to defend or concede each — deliverable in its final message, touching no files. Any delegation skill whose implementer offers a read-only mode supports the same use, but check how hard that mode's guarantee is first: Codex's sandbox enforces it, while Grok's is best-effort and only flagged after the fact (readOnlyViolation) — for those implementers, verify touchedFiles came back empty instead of assuming no edits.

Authorization model

Delegation is something the human opts into. Once they have ("run this queue", "proceed"), committing verified, gate-passing work is the agreed contract — that is the whole point. Two limits on that mandate: surface, don't absorb (report Codex's design decisions, defensible-but-unasked turns, and non-blocking nitpicks rather than silently keeping them) and stop for scope changes (if correct completion needs going beyond the brief, ask — don't expand the mandate yourself). The full treatment is in references/review-and-land.md.

If you have the openai-codex plugin

The official openai-codex Claude Code plugin is excellent and complementary — codex-delegate builds on the same codex CLI, it doesn't replace the plugin. They point in different directions:

the output. It deliberately does not poll, review, or commit.

  • The plugin's codex:codex-rescue agent is a forwarder: it hands one task to Codex and returns

implement across one task or a queue, and you review and land each result. That loop — brief → dispatch → poll → review → commit, with the orchestrator owning the commit — is what the plugin leaves to you, and what this skill encodes.

  • The plugin's review command and stop-review gate run the inverse direction: Codex reviews your work.
  • codex-delegate is the orchestration loop in the other direction: you drive Codex to

If you have the plugin installed, its companion CLI is an optional alternative dispatch backend; the bundled relay.mjs is the default because it adds no install of its own beyond the codex binary (Node and git, which the relay also needs, are prerequisites for every skill here).

References

execute blind: structure, XML blocks, the report contract, embedding the real gate commands.

  • references/writing-the-brief.md — how to write a brief Codex can

result.json contract, backgrounding per orchestrator, and recovery when a run misbehaves.

  • references/dispatch-and-poll.md — relay.mjs flags, the

boundary, and the exact-session rework cycle.

  • references/review-and-land.md — the review checklist, the commit

carrying constraints forward, progress tracking, and the end-of-run coherence check.

  • references/multi-task-queues.md — running a sequential queue:

More skills from amElnagdy/delegate-skills

  • Aagy-delegateDelegate a coding task to the Google Antigravity CLI (`agy`) as a background implementer, then review its diff and land it yourself. Use this whenever the user wants to hand implementation work to Antigravity or agy - phrasings like "have Antigravity do X", "delegate this to agy", "run it through agy", or "use Antigravity to implement/fix/refactor" - or wants to run a queue of coding tasks through agy while staying the reviewer. DO NOT USE for tasks small enough to do inline, or when the user wants the code written directly without delegating.
  • Aaider-delegateDelegate a coding task to Aider (`aider`) as a background implementer, then review its diff and land it yourself. Use this whenever the user wants to hand implementation work to Aider - phrasings like "have Aider do X", "delegate this to aider", "run it through Aider", or "use Aider to implement/fix/refactor" - or wants to run a queue of coding tasks through Aider while staying the reviewer. This includes asking Aider to drive a local or self-hosted OpenAI-compatible endpoint ("have Aider use my local model", "run Aider against llama.cpp / Ollama / vLLM / LM Studio"), which Aider reaches via `--api-base`. DO NOT USE for local-model or coding requests that do not name Aider, for tasks small enough to do inline, or when the user wants the code written directly without delegating.
  • Aclaude-delegateDelegate a coding task to a separate Claude Code CLI process or another Claude session as an implementer, then review its diff and land it yourself. Use only when the user explicitly asks to delegate implementation to Claude Code, another Claude session, or the `claude` CLI — for example, "have another Claude implement this", "delegate this to Claude Code", or "run this queue through a separate Claude session." Do not trigger merely because the current orchestrator is Claude, and do not use when the user asks the current Claude to implement directly without delegation.
  • Acline-delegateDelegate a coding task to the Cline coding agent CLI (`cline`) as a background implementer, then review its diff and land it yourself. Use this whenever the user wants to delegate implementation work to Cline - phrasings like "have Cline implement X", "delegate this to cline", "run it through Cline", or "use cline to implement/fix/refactor" - or wants to run a queue of coding tasks through Cline while staying the reviewer. DO NOT USE for tasks small enough to do inline, or when the user wants the code written directly without delegating.
  • Acommandcode-delegateDelegate a coding task to the Command Code CLI (`cmd`) as a background implementer, then review its diff and land it yourself. Use this whenever the user wants to hand implementation work to Command Code — phrasings like "have Command Code do X", "delegate this to commandcode", "run it through cmd", or "use Command Code to implement/fix/refactor" — or to run a queue of coding tasks through Command Code while staying the reviewer. DO NOT USE for tasks small enough to do inline, or when the user wants the code written directly without delegating.
  • Acopilot-delegateDelegate a coding task to the GitHub Copilot CLI (`copilot`) as a background implementer, then review its diff and land it yourself. Use this whenever the user wants to delegate implementation work to Copilot - phrasings like "have Copilot implement X", "delegate this to copilot", "run it through Copilot CLI", or "use copilot to implement/fix/refactor" - or wants to run a queue of coding tasks through Copilot while staying the reviewer. DO NOT USE for tasks small enough to do inline, or when the user wants the code written directly without delegating.
  • Acursor-delegateDelegate a coding task to the Cursor Agent CLI (`cursor-agent`) as a background implementer, then review its diff and land it yourself. Use this whenever the user wants to hand implementation work to Cursor — phrasings like "have Cursor implement X", "delegate this to Cursor", "run it through Cursor Agent", or "use Cursor to implement/fix/refactor" — or wants to run a queue of coding tasks through Cursor while staying the reviewer. DO NOT USE for tasks small enough to do inline, or when the user wants the code written directly without delegating.
  • Adelegate-setupConfigure delegation fleet lanes: which implementer CLI handles which kind of work, with optional model and effort (or variant) dials. Discovers installed CLIs, proposes a lane map for user approval, and writes global or project config only after explicit yes. Use when the user asks to set up, configure, or reconfigure delegation lanes, a fleet of lanes, or which implementer handles feature/tests/ui work — not for dispatching a coding task to an implementer.
  • Agrok-delegateDelegate a coding task to the Grok Build CLI as a background implementer, then review its diff and land it yourself. Use this whenever the user wants to hand implementation work to Grok — phrasings like "have Grok do X", "delegate this to Grok", "run it through Grok", "use Grok Build to implement/fix/refactor", or "have grok CLI do this" — or to run a queue of coding tasks through Grok while staying the reviewer. Prefer it when the user will review the diff and commit it themselves. DO NOT USE for tasks small enough to do inline, or when the user wants the code written directly without delegating.
  • Akimi-delegateDelegate a coding task to the Kimi Code CLI (`kimi`) as a background implementer, then review its diff and land it yourself. Use this whenever the user wants to hand implementation work to Kimi - phrasings like "have Kimi implement X", "delegate this to Kimi", "run it through Kimi Code", or "use Kimi to implement/fix/refactor" - or wants to run a queue of coding tasks through Kimi while staying the reviewer. DO NOT USE for tasks small enough to do inline, or when the user wants the code written directly without delegating.
  • Aomp-delegateDelegate a coding task to Oh My Pi (`omp`) as a background implementer, then review its diff and land it yourself. Use this whenever the user wants to delegate implementation work to Oh My Pi / omp - phrasings like "have omp implement X", "delegate this to oh my pi", "run it through omp", "use oh-my-pi to implement/fix/refactor" - or wants to run a queue of coding tasks through omp while staying the reviewer. DO NOT USE for tasks small enough to do inline, when the user wants the code written directly without delegating, or when they mean the original Pi CLI (`pi`) — that is pi-delegate.
  • Aopencode-delegateDelegate a coding task to the OpenCode CLI as a background implementer, then review its diff and land it yourself. Use this whenever the user wants to hand implementation work to OpenCode — phrasings like "have OpenCode do X", "delegate this to OpenCode", "run it through OpenCode", or "use OpenCode to implement/fix/refactor" — or wants to run a queue of coding tasks through OpenCode while staying the reviewer. Prefer it when the user will review the diff and commit it themselves. DO NOT USE for tasks small enough to do inline, or when the user wants the code written directly without delegating.

All agent skills → · MCP servers