MCP.Market

Verify Claim MCP server

by sudo-ai-git·io.github.sudo-ai-git/mcp-verify-claim·v1.0.0

Force evidence-gated, tiered claim reporting (FACT/INFERENCE/SPECULATION). No-LLM.

A88/100grade A
What users say
No reviews yet
Be the first
Safety scan
A88/100

full report

Adoption
New

0 stars23 downloads/wk

Reviews

Write one

Nobody has reviewed Verify Claim yet.

If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.

Verify Claim tools (4)

write = sends, deletes, buys or posts

Read from the package source without running it. The installed server may list more.

  • check_claim

    Scan a claim string for fabrication/hedging signals (deterministic, no-LLM). Returns the matched signals + a prelim verdict. Lower-level than tier_claim; use when you only have the claim text, no evidence yet.

  • report_templates

    Return the canonical completion-report shape (STATUS / EVIDENCE / GAPS) and the outline of the evidence-tier loop, so any agent can format an honest completion report consistently.

  • tier_claim

    Classify a claim into an evidence tier (FACT / INFERENCE / SPECULATION / UNVERIFIED) based on the attached evidence and verification kind. Returns the tier, its definition, a verdict (TRUST / REVIEW / DO-NOT-REPORT), and an honest next-action. Use before reporting any outcome to a user.

  • tier_definitions

    Return the FACT/INFERENCE/SPECULATION/UNVERIFIED definitions.

Public scan report

scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-30 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

no findings
  • Code scan2 source files scanned25/25
  • –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
  • –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
  • Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
  • Maintenancelast push 63 days ago12/15
  • Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10
Overall 88/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON

How Verify Claim compares

Against every graded AI and agents MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score
88/100
higher than 80% of 4,460 AI and agents servers
Tools
4
the typical AI and agents server has 6
Tools that change things
0%
typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
Downloads a week
23
more than 9% of 1,538 AI and agents servers with a package

What its tools let an agent do: 4 read

Install Verify Claim in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code

claude mcp add mcp-verify-claim -- uvx mcp-verify-claim
Add to Cursor

What the publisher says

From the Verify Claim repository's README, as published. We do not edit it. Read it on GitHub

mcp-verify-claim

A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that forces evidence-gated, honestly tiered claim reporting. Every claim an agent makes gets classified into an evidence tier (FACT / INFERENCE / SPECULATION / UNVERIFIED) with attached evidence — the antidote to the silent-unverified-claim failure mode ("pushed successfully", "the tests pass", "the API returned 200" — asserted without ever running the command).

Deterministic, no LLM, no network calls. Self-hostable, MCP-compatible with any agent (Claude Code, Cursor, Copilot, OpenClaw, Codex CLI).

Why it exists

The most common agent failure is not wrong reasoning — it's reporting a plausible-sounding result that was never verified. mcp-verify-claim installs a hard gate: no unverified claim can be reported as fact.

The pattern it fits (agent tooling that answers with evidence, not opinion)

When you give an agent access to real operations (edits, checks, rule evaluation, mutations) through MCP, the value is that it can answer with evidence instead of opinion — it ran the check, it saw the real state, it can prove what it did. But that only holds if the agent is forced to attach the evidence. A rules-and-checks surface ("is the module valid?", "did this state change slice apply?", "what actually changed?") is exactly the high-value case: each check produces a machine-verifiable result.

mcp-verify-claim is the gate that guarantees the agent reports the result with its evidence attached (exit code, real read-back, actual HTTP status) and cannot pass off a guess or an unrun step as truth. Pair it with any MCP surface that exposes operations, and the agent's answers become auditable, line-by-line, instead of plausible.

Tools

tier + verdict (TRUST / REVIEW / DO-NOT-REPORT) + honest next-action.

  • tierclaim(claim, evidence, verificationkind) — classify a claim into a

(completion-without-artifact, "the API returned", hedge words).

  • check_claim(claim) — deterministic scan for fabrication/hedging signals

shape and the 6-step behavioral loop.

  • report_templates() — the canonical STATUS / EVIDENCE / GAPS completion

definitions.

  • tier_definitions() — the FACT / INFERENCE / SPECULATION / UNVERIFIED

Evidence tier (the core)

Install & run

One command (recommended) — installs from the repo, no PyPI token needed:

uv tool install git+https://github.com/sudo-ai-git/mcp-verify-claim
mcp-verify-claim                         # run stdio server
mcp-verify-claim --http --port 8137      # or Streamable HTTP for remote use

Or with pipx: pipx install git+https://github.com/sudo-ai-git/mcp-verify-claim

Direct from source (fallback):

pip install mcp
python3 mcp_server.py

Claude Desktop / agent config

{ "mcpServers": {
    "verify-claim": { "command": "mcp-verify-claim", "args": [] }
}}

Example

tier_claim("Successfully deployed", evidence="", verification_kind="")
--> tier UNVERIFIED, verdict DO-NOT-REPORT
    signals: [high] completion claim without artifact
    next: go get the evidence before reporting

tier_claim("Deploy is live", evidence="origin/main SHA==local HEAD, HTTP 200", verification_kind="read_back")
--> tier FACT, verdict TRUST

Part of a family

This is one of three deterministic, no-LLM agent-trust MCP servers by sudo-ai-git:

Shortened. The full README is on GitHub.

Nothing above is checked by us. What we check is on the safety report.

Verify Claim: common questions

Is Verify Claim MCP server safe?
Yes, by our scan: it is graded A (88/100). Read the Verify Claim safety report
How do I install Verify Claim?
It runs on your machine. Copy the Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Claude Desktop config from the install section.
Does Verify Claim need an API key?
Not as far as the registry entry and our scan can tell: no credentials are declared or required.
Is Verify Claim maintained?
The last commit was 68 days ago (2026-08-28). The latest release is v1.0.0.
What can I use instead of Verify Claim?
Servers from other publishers that do the same job: Watch Skill MCP server, HOL Guard MCP server and Actual Budget MCP Server.
How does Verify Claim compare with other AI and agents MCP servers?
safety score 88/100 (higher than 80% of 4,460 AI and agents servers); tools 4 (the typical AI and agents server has 6); tools that change things 0% (typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break). Full comparison.

Alternatives to Verify Claim

Same job from other publishers: the closest match first, then the best rated.

  • Watch Skill
    Watch video and live sessions, keep timestamped evidence, and verify an agent's own work.
    B
  • HOL Guard
    Local-first AI agent security evidence and approval workflows through HOL Guard's stdio MCP server.
    A
  • Actual Budget MCP Server
    MCP server exposing Actual Budget accounts, transactions, budgets and reporting to LLM assistants.
    B
  • OpenWorkProof
    Verifiable agent evidence; opt-in Codex guard and reference SOC alert review.
    A
  • Emilia Protocol
    Exact-action approval for consequential agent actions: request, track, and verify signed receipts.
    B

More from sudo-ai-git →