Verify Claim MCP server
Force evidence-gated, tiered claim reporting (FACT/INFERENCE/SPECULATION). No-LLM.
0 stars23 downloads/wk
Reviews
Write oneNobody has reviewed Verify Claim yet.
If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.
Verify Claim tools (4)
write = sends, deletes, buys or postsRead from the package source without running it. The installed server may list more.
check_claimScan a claim string for fabrication/hedging signals (deterministic, no-LLM). Returns the matched signals + a prelim verdict. Lower-level than tier_claim; use when you only have the claim text, no evidence yet.
report_templatesReturn the canonical completion-report shape (STATUS / EVIDENCE / GAPS) and the outline of the evidence-tier loop, so any agent can format an honest completion report consistently.
tier_claimClassify a claim into an evidence tier (FACT / INFERENCE / SPECULATION / UNVERIFIED) based on the attached evidence and verification kind. Returns the tier, its definition, a verdict (TRUST / REVIEW / DO-NOT-REPORT), and an honest next-action. Use before reporting any outcome to a user.
tier_definitionsReturn the FACT/INFERENCE/SPECULATION/UNVERIFIED definitions.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-30 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
- Code scan2 source files scanned25/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
- Maintenancelast push 63 days ago12/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10
How Verify Claim compares
Against every graded AI and agents MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 88/100
- higher than 80% of 4,460 AI and agents servers
- Tools
- 4
- the typical AI and agents server has 6
- Tools that change things
- 0%
- typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
- Downloads a week
- 23
- more than 9% of 1,538 AI and agents servers with a package
What its tools let an agent do: 4 read
Install Verify Claim in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code
claude mcp add mcp-verify-claim -- uvx mcp-verify-claim
What the publisher says
From the Verify Claim repository's README, as published. We do not edit it. Read it on GitHub
mcp-verify-claim
A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that forces evidence-gated, honestly tiered claim reporting. Every claim an agent makes gets classified into an evidence tier (FACT / INFERENCE / SPECULATION / UNVERIFIED) with attached evidence — the antidote to the silent-unverified-claim failure mode ("pushed successfully", "the tests pass", "the API returned 200" — asserted without ever running the command).
Deterministic, no LLM, no network calls. Self-hostable, MCP-compatible with any agent (Claude Code, Cursor, Copilot, OpenClaw, Codex CLI).
Why it exists
The most common agent failure is not wrong reasoning — it's reporting a plausible-sounding result that was never verified. mcp-verify-claim installs a hard gate: no unverified claim can be reported as fact.
The pattern it fits (agent tooling that answers with evidence, not opinion)
When you give an agent access to real operations (edits, checks, rule evaluation, mutations) through MCP, the value is that it can answer with evidence instead of opinion — it ran the check, it saw the real state, it can prove what it did. But that only holds if the agent is forced to attach the evidence. A rules-and-checks surface ("is the module valid?", "did this state change slice apply?", "what actually changed?") is exactly the high-value case: each check produces a machine-verifiable result.
mcp-verify-claim is the gate that guarantees the agent reports the result with its evidence attached (exit code, real read-back, actual HTTP status) and cannot pass off a guess or an unrun step as truth. Pair it with any MCP surface that exposes operations, and the agent's answers become auditable, line-by-line, instead of plausible.
Tools
tier + verdict (TRUST / REVIEW / DO-NOT-REPORT) + honest next-action.
- tierclaim(claim, evidence, verificationkind) — classify a claim into a
(completion-without-artifact, "the API returned", hedge words).
- check_claim(claim) — deterministic scan for fabrication/hedging signals
shape and the 6-step behavioral loop.
- report_templates() — the canonical STATUS / EVIDENCE / GAPS completion
definitions.
- tier_definitions() — the FACT / INFERENCE / SPECULATION / UNVERIFIED
Evidence tier (the core)
Install & run
One command (recommended) — installs from the repo, no PyPI token needed:
uv tool install git+https://github.com/sudo-ai-git/mcp-verify-claim
mcp-verify-claim # run stdio server
mcp-verify-claim --http --port 8137 # or Streamable HTTP for remote useOr with pipx: pipx install git+https://github.com/sudo-ai-git/mcp-verify-claim
Direct from source (fallback):
pip install mcp
python3 mcp_server.pyClaude Desktop / agent config
{ "mcpServers": {
"verify-claim": { "command": "mcp-verify-claim", "args": [] }
}}Example
tier_claim("Successfully deployed", evidence="", verification_kind="")
--> tier UNVERIFIED, verdict DO-NOT-REPORT
signals: [high] completion claim without artifact
next: go get the evidence before reporting
tier_claim("Deploy is live", evidence="origin/main SHA==local HEAD, HTTP 200", verification_kind="read_back")
--> tier FACT, verdict TRUSTPart of a family
This is one of three deterministic, no-LLM agent-trust MCP servers by sudo-ai-git:
Shortened. The full README is on GitHub.
Nothing above is checked by us. What we check is on the safety report.
Verify Claim: common questions
- Is Verify Claim MCP server safe?
- Yes, by our scan: it is graded A (88/100). Read the Verify Claim safety report
- How do I install Verify Claim?
- It runs on your machine. Copy the Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Claude Desktop config from the install section.
- Does Verify Claim need an API key?
- Not as far as the registry entry and our scan can tell: no credentials are declared or required.
- Is Verify Claim maintained?
- The last commit was 68 days ago (2026-08-28). The latest release is v1.0.0.
- What can I use instead of Verify Claim?
- Servers from other publishers that do the same job: Watch Skill MCP server, HOL Guard MCP server and Actual Budget MCP Server.
- How does Verify Claim compare with other AI and agents MCP servers?
- safety score 88/100 (higher than 80% of 4,460 AI and agents servers); tools 4 (the typical AI and agents server has 6); tools that change things 0% (typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break). Full comparison.
Alternatives to Verify Claim
Same job from other publishers: the closest match first, then the best rated.
- Watch SkillWatch video and live sessions, keep timestamped evidence, and verify an agent's own work.not reviewedEstablishedB
- HOL GuardLocal-first AI agent security evidence and approval workflows through HOL Guard's stdio MCP server.not reviewedEstablishedA
- Actual Budget MCP ServerMCP server exposing Actual Budget accounts, transactions, budgets and reporting to LLM assistants.not reviewedEstablishedB
- OpenWorkProofVerifiable agent evidence; opt-in Codex guard and reference SOC alert review.not reviewedEstablishedA
- Emilia ProtocolExact-action approval for consequential agent actions: request, track, and verify signed receipts.not reviewedEstablishedB