Cabal Hunter MCP server

• check_cabal_riskFree

  Pre-trade safety check for any Solana token mint: is a buyer about to be someone's exit liquidity? Every wallet cluster carries its evidence_txs. AFTER YOU BUY: POST /api/watch {mint, webhook_url} with an X-API-Key (a free key is enough) and we push you an alert the moment a coordinated dump or liquidity drain starts on that token — carrying the same on-chain evidence. This scan is a BUY check; a watch is a HOLD check, and a holder needs the second one continuously. GET/DELETE /api/watch manage your own. Layers, ordered by STRENGTH OF EVIDENCE (not marketing): 1. HOLDER CONCENTRATION — what share one wallet actually controls (`top_holder_pct`). A single wallet that can crater the price is the most basic rug vector, and it needs no coordination at all. IMPORTANT: we count only REAL wallets. LP pools, locked/vesting supply and other program-owned accounts are excluded and labelled, never scored as a whale — and supply comes from getTokenSupply, not an estimate. Tools that skip this report a locked-supply token as '65% one wallet'. Our numbers reconcile with GMGN's circulating top-10. 2. SAME-BLOCK BUNDLES — holders whose token accounts were created in the EXACT same block: a multi-wallet launch bought in one slot. A Jito bundle is one way to do that, not the only one - we read the slot, not the bundle. `time_sync: true`. 3. COORDINATED DUMP — ≥2 holders each selling ≥25% of their bag in the same block: a cabal exiting in real time. `coordinated_exit: true`, sold_pct. 4. HONEYPOT / AUTHORITY TRAPS (Solana-native) — live freeze authority, un-revoked mint authority, Token-2022 transfer-fee / transfer-hook / permanent-delegate traps. Answers: CAN you actually sell this token? 5. DEV TRACK RECORD — the creator resolved on-chain plus their full launch history WITH the peak market cap each past token hit, so a dead-count can't hide a pump-and-dump. Covers ANY Solana venue: pump.fun, Raydium, Orca, Meteora, PumpSwap. A launch counts only where the transaction actually CREATED the mint, so re-minting supply of an existing token is never miscounted as a launch. reputation (SERIAL_RUGGER / DEAD_ON_ARRIVAL / MIXED / PROVEN) + best_peak_usd, pump_and_dumps count; paid tier adds launches[] (peak_mcap_usd, now_mcap_usd, drawdown, status per launch). 'Ran to $728k, now dust' = this dev has dumped six figures on holders before. Still CAPPED: peak history is evidence, never softens the score. READ deployer.verdict CAREFULLY — two values mean opposite things: FIRST_LAUNCH = we walked the history and found no earlier tokens. UNKNOWN = the history could NOT be established. That is not evidence of anything and must never be treated as a clean record. 6. FUNDING-CLUSTER TRACE — top holders walked back to a shared funding wallet. A real capability, listed last on purpose: on our own sample it produced no verified detections once infrastructure (curve PDAs, token accounts) was correctly excluded. Treat it as supporting evidence. Returns risk (CLEAN|MEDIUM|HIGH), cabal_score 0–100, top_holder_pct, cluster breakdown with evidence_txs[], holder map, deployer verdict, honeypot_risk, plus wallets_checked / scan_complete / degraded so YOUR agent can apply its own risk tolerance instead of inheriting ours. If we cannot verify something, we say so (`degraded: true`) rather than returning a confident 'clean'. COST: 5 scans/month FREE with no signup and no API key; 250/month free with a key (one email, no card). After that $0.001 USDC per scan. Two ways to pay, no signup or card: (1) $9/month UNLIMITED (fair use, 50k/mo) — best for 24/7 bots; or prepaid pay-as-you-go at $0.001/scan (any amount) — POST the tx to /api/buy-key, then send header X-API-Key; or (2) per-call via x402 (X-Payment-Signature header). Full terms: GET /api/info. FRESHNESS: a token traced in the last 8 hours is answered from that trace in <100ms; computed_at (unix seconds) says exactly when it was traced. Any other token runs the full live on-chain trace and takes 15-20s — set your client timeout to at least 30s or you will abandon a scan that was about to succeed.

• check_wallet_in_tokenFree

  Is a SPECIFIC wallet involved in a SPECIFIC Solana token? Use this when a user names a wallet they are worried about, or when your agent keeps its own watchlist of addresses and wants to screen a token against one. Answers from two sources at once: 1. the traced holders of that token — rank, % of supply, buy slot, whether it funded a coordinated cluster, whether it created the token, or whether it is the liquidity pool / a labelled exchange wallet 2. a LIVE on-chain holding lookup, so a wallet too small to appear in the trace is still resolved rather than dismissed HOW TO READ THE RESULT — this matters more than the fields: found_in_scan=false is NOT a clean bill of health. The trace covers the largest holders, so a smaller position sits outside it, and a wallet that sold out and closed its token account leaves nothing to observe. Never tell a user a wallet is 'clean' or 'not involved' on this result. The `note` field states the limit of what was actually checked; relay it. holding.sold_out=true is the strong signal: a token account exists holding none of the token, i.e. this wallet HELD it and has since sold out. track_record, when present, counts earlier tokens the wallet was early in and how many graduated. It is an association measured out-of-sample, NOT a profit signal and not a recommendation to copy or avoid anyone. Absence of a track record means we hold no record, not that the wallet has no history. Free, no API key, rate limited per caller. For screening MANY wallets on every scan automatically, the Screen List add-on stores a private list per key: POST /api/screen-list/checkout.

• –Code scanremote-only server, no package to scann/a
• Live reliabilityremote reachable in 1125ms20/20
• Tool poisoning2 tool descriptions checked13/15
• Auth qualityopen endpoint, read-only tools10/15
• Maintenancelast push 5 days ago15/15
• Maintainer identitynamespace and repository owner differ; website matches verified namespace5/10

Safety score

84/100

higher than 68% of 48,255 servers

Tools

2

the typical server has 7

Tools that change things

0%

typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break

Uptime

96%

of our recent checks; the typical remote server answers 100%

Response time

149 ms

faster than 73% of 30,031 servers

GitHub stars

1

more than 65% of 28,688 servers

Cabal Hunter: common questions

Is Cabal Hunter MCP server safe?

Mostly: it is graded B (84/100). Read the Cabal Hunter safety report

How do I install Cabal Hunter?

It runs remotely at api.cabal-hunter.com. Add it to Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Claude Desktop with the snippets above, or call it through the mcp.market gateway without installing anything.

Does Cabal Hunter need an API key?

Not as far as the registry entry and our scan can tell: no credentials are declared or required.

Is Cabal Hunter maintained?

The last commit was 44 days ago (2026-09-21). The latest release is v1.2.0.

Is Cabal Hunter up?

96% of our last 28 checks got an answer. We check remote servers about four times a day.

How does Cabal Hunter compare with other MCP servers?

safety score 84/100 (higher than 68% of 48,255 servers); tools 2 (the typical server has 7); tools that change things 0% (typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break). Full comparison.