Is Cabal Hunter MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.
No critical or high findings in the latest scan.
How Cabal Hunter compares
Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 84/100
- higher than 68% of 48,255 servers
- Tools that change things
- 0%
- typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
- Uptime
- 96%
- of our recent checks; the typical remote server answers 100%
What its tools let an agent do: 2 read
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-26 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 low
- –Code scanremote-only server, no package to scann/a
- Live reliabilityremote reachable in 1125ms20/20
- Tool poisoning2 tool descriptions checked13/15
- Auth qualityopen endpoint, read-only tools10/15
- Maintenancelast push 5 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identitynamespace and repository owner differ; website matches verified namespace5/10
Findings (1)
- lowUnusually long tool description (over 2,000 characters)
poison.long-descriptiontool check_cabal_risk: …Pre-trade safety check for any Solana token mint: is a buyer about to be someone's exit liquidity? Every wallet cluster carries its evidence_txs. AFTER YOU BUY: POST /api/watch {mint, webhook_url} with an X-API-Key (a free key is enough) and we push you an alert the moment a coordinated dump or liquidity drain starts on that token — carrying the same on-chain evidence. This scan is a BUY check; a watch is a HOLD check, and a holder needs the second one continuously. GET/DELETE /api/watch manage your own. Layers, ordered by STRENGTH OF EVIDENCE (not marketing): 1. HOLDER CONCENTRATION — what share one wallet actually controls (`top_holder_pct`). A single wallet that can crater the price is the most basic rug vector, and it needs no coordination at all. IMPORTANT: we count only REAL wallets. LP pools, locked/vesting supply and other program-owned accounts are excluded and labelled, never scored as a whale — and supply comes from getTokenSupply, not an estimate. Tools that skip this report a locked-supply token as '65% one wallet'. Our numbers reconcile with GMGN's circulating top-10. 2. SAME-BLOCK BUNDLES — holders whose token accounts were created in the EXACT same block: a multi-wallet launch bought in one slot. A Jito bundle is one way to do that, not the only one - we read the slot, not the bundle. `time_sync: true`. 3. COORDINATED DUMP — ≥2 holders each selling ≥25% of their bag in the same block: a cabal exiting in real time. `coordinated_exit: true`, sold_pct. 4. HONEYPOT / AUTHORITY TRAPS (Solana-native) — live freeze authority, un-revoked mint authority, Token-2022 transfer-fee / transfer-hook / permanent-delegate traps. Answers: CAN you actually sell this token? 5. DEV TRACK RECORD — the creator resolved on-chain plus their full launch history WITH the peak market cap each past token hit, so a dead-count can't hide a pump-and-dump. Covers ANY Solana venue: pump.fun, Raydium, Orca, Meteora, PumpSwap. A launch counts only where the transaction actually CREATED the mint, so re-minting supply of an existing token is never miscounted as a launch. reputation (SERIAL_RUGGER / DEAD_ON_ARRIVAL / MIXED / PROVEN) + best_peak_usd, pump_and_dumps count; paid tier adds launches[] (peak_mcap_usd, now_mcap_usd, drawdown, status per launch). 'Ran to $728k, now dust' = this dev has dumped six figures on holders before. Still CAPPED: peak history is evidence, never softens the score. READ deployer.verdict CAREFULLY — two values mean opposite things: FIRST_LAUNCH = we walked the history and found no earlier tokens. UNKNOWN = the history could NOT be established. That is not evidence of anything and must never be treated as a clean record. 6. FUNDING-CLUSTER TRACE — top holders walked back to a shared funding wallet. A real capability, listed last on purpose: on our own sample it produced no verified detections once infrastructure (curve PDAs, token accounts) was correctly excluded. Treat it as supporting evidence. Returns risk (CLEAN|MEDIUM|HIGH), cabal_score 0–100, top_holder_pct, cluster breakdown with evidence_txs[], holder map, deployer verdict, honeypot_risk, plus wallets_checked / scan_complete / degraded so YOUR agent can apply its own risk tolerance instead of inheriting ours. If we cannot verify something, we say so (`degraded: true`) rather than returning a confident 'clean'. COST: 5 scans/month FREE with no signup and no API key; 250/month free with a key (one email, no card). After that $0.001 USDC per scan. Two ways to pay, no signup or card: (1) $9/month UNLIMITED (fair use, 50k/mo) — best for 24/7 bots; or prepaid pay-as-you-go at $0.001/scan (any amount) — POST the tx to /api/buy-key, then send header X-API-Key; or (2) per-call via x402 (X-Payment-Signature header). Full terms: GET /api/info. FRESHNESS: a token traced in the last 8 hours is answered from that trace in <100ms; computed_at (unix seconds) says exactly when it was traced. Any other token runs the full live on-chain trace and takes 15-20s — set your client timeout to at least 30s or you will abandon a scan that was about to succeed.…
Overall 84/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON