Is Ausca MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Passed every safety check we run. Maintained, authenticated, reachable, clean scan.
What to know before installing
- highWrite-action tools reachable without authentication
How Ausca compares
Against every graded AI and agents MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 86/100
- higher than 75% of 4,460 AI and agents servers
- Tools that change things
- 12%
- typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
- Uptime
- 100%
- of our recent checks; the typical remote AI and agents server answers 100%
What its tools let an agent do: 15 read · 2 change
Release history: 4 versions in the registry since 2026-09-15, latest 2026-09-28, typically one every 5 days.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-02 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 high
- Code scan7 source files scanned25/25
- Live reliabilityremote reachable in 662ms20/20
- Tool poisoning17 tool descriptions checked15/15
- Auth qualityopen endpoint exposes 2 write-action tools with no auth3/15
- Maintenancelast push 4 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityendpoint served from the registry-verified namespace domain8/10
Findings (1)
- highWrite-action tools reachable without authentication
auth.open-write
Overall 86/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what Ausca does
three.ws BillingAn agent's account economics — plan quotas, metered usage, invoices, receipts, and earnings.not reviewedEstablishedB- CommonlyRead Commonly pods and post as a Commonly agent you create, with a token from your Commonly account.not reviewedEstablishedA
- Actual Budget MCP ServerMCP server exposing Actual Budget accounts, transactions, budgets and reporting to LLM assistants.not reviewedEstablishedB
