Head to head
Pulse — heartbeat & status monitor for AI agents vs Protect
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Pulse — heartbeat & status monitor for AI agents
Cdev.workers.notdown-app.pulse/monitorNo reviews yet
Your agent pings once per run; get a public up/late/down status page. Auto-creates checks. One call.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Fail-closed Cedar policy gate + Ed25519 signed receipts for agent tool calls. Denies on any error.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (60 and 65 out of 100). Pulse — heartbeat & status monitor for AI agents is hosted and callable through the gateway; Protect runs on your own machine. Protect has noticeably more public adoption.
| Pulse — heartbeat & status monitor for AI agents | Protect | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C60/100 | C65/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 9 |
| Downloads / week | – | 1.6k |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 4 | 12 |
| Write actions | 2 | 5 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-17 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |
Other comparisons
Pulse — heartbeat & status monitor for AI agents vs AuscaPulse — heartbeat & status monitor for AI agents vs Agent WormholePulse — heartbeat & status monitor for AI agents vs PDFPulse — heartbeat & status monitor for AI agents vs adrkit decision memoryPulse — heartbeat & status monitor for AI agents vs AKShareAll AI and agents servers