Head to head
adrkit decision memory vs Pulse — heartbeat & status monitor for AI agents
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Deterministic, offline, read-only ADR decision memory for coding agents. No model or network calls.
Full listingPulse — heartbeat & status monitor for AI agents
Cdev.workers.notdown-app.pulse/monitorNo reviews yet
Your agent pings once per run; get a public up/late/down status page. Auto-creates checks. One call.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours adrkit decision memory (91/100 against 60). Pulse — heartbeat & status monitor for AI agents is hosted and callable through the gateway; adrkit decision memory runs on your own machine. adrkit decision memory has noticeably more public adoption.
| adrkit decision memory | Pulse — heartbeat & status monitor for AI agents | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A91/100 | C60/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 16 | – |
| Downloads / week | 419 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 4 | 4 |
| Write actions | — | 2 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | — |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |