Head to head
Pulse — heartbeat & status monitor for AI agents vs Agent Wormhole
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Pulse — heartbeat & status monitor for AI agents
Cdev.workers.notdown-app.pulse/monitorNo reviews yet
Your agent pings once per run; get a public up/late/down status page. Auto-creates checks. One call.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Check tokens, pages and x402 payments before your agent trusts them. Offline verdicts.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Agent Wormhole (83/100 against 60). Pulse — heartbeat & status monitor for AI agents is hosted and callable through the gateway; Agent Wormhole runs on your own machine. Agent Wormhole has noticeably more public adoption.
| Pulse — heartbeat & status monitor for AI agents | Agent Wormhole | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C60/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 3 |
| Downloads / week | – | 776 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 4 | 5 |
| Write actions | 2 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |
Other comparisons
Pulse — heartbeat & status monitor for AI agents vs AuscaPulse — heartbeat & status monitor for AI agents vs PDFPulse — heartbeat & status monitor for AI agents vs adrkit decision memoryPulse — heartbeat & status monitor for AI agents vs AKSharePulse — heartbeat & status monitor for AI agents vs DocPullAll AI and agents servers