Head to head
Ausca vs Pulse — heartbeat & status monitor for AI agents
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Pay-per-call APIs and MCP services for agents, no accounts or keys, with verifiable receipts.
Full listingPulse — heartbeat & status monitor for AI agents
Cdev.workers.notdown-app.pulse/monitorNo reviews yet
Your agent pings once per run; get a public up/late/down status page. Auto-creates checks. One call.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Ausca (84/100 against 60). Ausca has noticeably more public adoption.
| Ausca | Pulse — heartbeat & status monitor for AI agents | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B84/100 | C60/100 |
| Adoption | Established | New |
| GitHub stars | 15 | – |
| Downloads / week | 220 | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | — | 4 |
| Write actions | — | 2 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | — |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |