Head to head
Wt vs HIG Doctor
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Wt
Cio.github.HumanLineage/wtNo reviews yet
Human Lineage MCP server — search and query the public genealogical graph of all humanity
Full listing
No reviews yet
Apple Human Interface Guidelines search, lookup, and project audits for AI coding agents.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours HIG Doctor (83/100 against 57). Wt is hosted and callable through the gateway; HIG Doctor runs on your own machine. HIG Doctor has noticeably more public adoption.
| Wt | HIG Doctor | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C57/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | New | Established |
| GitHub stars | – | 129 |
| Downloads / week | – | 106 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | 6 |
| Write actions | — | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-11 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |