Head to head
Wt vs Octocode
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Wt
Cio.github.HumanLineage/wtNo reviews yet
Human Lineage MCP server — search and query the public genealogical graph of all humanity
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Octocode (94/100 against 57). Wt is hosted and callable through the gateway; Octocode runs on your own machine. Octocode has noticeably more public adoption.
| Wt | Octocode | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C57/100 | A94/100 |
| Adoption | New | Established |
| GitHub stars | – | 475 |
| Downloads / week | – | 404 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |