Head to head
GitHits vs Wt
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Search public open-source code, documentation, metadata, vulnerabilities, changelogs, and examples.
Full listingWt
Cio.github.HumanLineage/wtNo reviews yet
Human Lineage MCP server — search and query the public genealogical graph of all humanity
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours GitHits (98/100 against 57). GitHits has noticeably more public adoption.
| GitHits | Wt | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A98/100 | C57/100 |
| Adoption | Established | New |
| GitHub stars | 107 | – |
| Downloads / week | 2.3k | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | — |
| Category | Web search | Web search |