Head to head
Arxiv vs Wt
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Search arXiv papers, download full text, semantic search, citation graphs, and alerts via MCP.
Full listingWt
Cio.github.HumanLineage/wtNo reviews yet
Human Lineage MCP server — search and query the public genealogical graph of all humanity
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Arxiv (92/100 against 57). Wt is hosted and callable through the gateway; Arxiv runs on your own machine. Arxiv has noticeably more public adoption.
| Arxiv | Wt | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | C57/100 |
| Adoption | Established | New |
| GitHub stars | 3.2k | – |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | — |
| Last release | 2026-08-26 | — |
| Category | Web search | Web search |