Head to head
Wt vs Reverie
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Wt
Cio.github.HumanLineage/wtNo reviews yet
Human Lineage MCP server — search and query the public genealogical graph of all humanity
Full listingNo reviews yet
Graph memory that dreams: Neo4j knowledge-graph memory for AI agents with hybrid search
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Reverie (80/100 against 57). Wt is hosted and callable through the gateway; Reverie runs on your own machine. Reverie has noticeably more public adoption.
| Wt | Reverie | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C57/100 | B80/100 |
| Adoption | New | Established |
| GitHub stars | – | 69 |
| Downloads / week | – | 63 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-17 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |