Head to head
Exa vs CLIO Web
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Connect AI agents to Exa for web search, content fetching, and multi-step research.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Provider-fixed web search plus transparent URL, DOI, and document fetching
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (91 and 94 out of 100). Exa is hosted and callable through the gateway; CLIO Web runs on your own machine.
| Exa | CLIO Web | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A91/100 | A94/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Established |
| GitHub stars | 5.2k | 30 |
| Downloads / week | – | 8.9k |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 2 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | BSD-3-Clause |
| Last release | 2026-11-03 | 2026-10-28 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |