Head to head
webclaw vs Exa
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Web scraping, search, crawling, structured extraction and research for AI agents.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Connect AI agents to Exa for web search, content fetching, and multi-step research.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (92 and 91 out of 100).
| webclaw | Exa | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | A91/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Established |
| GitHub stars | 2.4k | 5.2k |
| Downloads / week | 137 | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | — | 2 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-23 | 2026-11-03 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |