Head to head
PostgreSQL (hardened, read-only) vs Run402
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
PostgreSQL (hardened, read-only)
Cio.github.Eszetael/postgres-mcp-hardenedNo reviews yet
Read-only PostgreSQL over MCP. Writes refused at the parsed SQL, plus a READ ONLY transaction.
Full listing
No reviews yet
x402 pay-per-call infra for agents: $0.03 image generation, Postgres, auth, storage, functions.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Run402 (84/100 against 68). Run402 is hosted and callable through the gateway; PostgreSQL (hardened, read-only) runs on your own machine. Run402 has noticeably more public adoption.
| PostgreSQL (hardened, read-only) | Run402 | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C68/100 | B84/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 3 | 24 |
| Downloads / week | 91 | 3.5k |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 4 |
| Write actions | — | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-20 | 2026-09-23 |
| Category | Databases | Databases |