Mmcp.market

Head to head

DBHub vs PostgreSQL (hardened, read-only)

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

DBHubio.github.bytebase/dbhub
A
No reviews yet

Token-efficient database MCP server for PostgreSQL, MySQL, MariaDB, SQL Server, Oracle, SQLite

Full listing
PostgreSQL (hardened, read-only)io.github.Eszetael/postgres-mcp-hardened
C
No reviews yet

Read-only PostgreSQL over MCP. Writes refused at the parsed SQL, plus a READ ONLY transaction.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours DBHub (85/100 against 68). DBHub has noticeably more public adoption.

 DBHubPostgreSQL (hardened, read-only)
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA85/100C68/100
AdoptionWidely usedGrowing
GitHub stars3.5k3
Downloads / week21k91
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITMIT
Last release2026-09-192026-09-20
CategoryDatabasesDatabases

Other comparisons

DBHub vs oraclemcpDBHub vs JDBC MCP ServerDBHub vs LINQ to DBDBHub vs Magic CloudDBHub vs Gnosis MCPAll Databases servers