Mmcp.market

Head to head

PostgreSQL (hardened, read-only) vs PostgreSQL MCP Server

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

PostgreSQL (hardened, read-only)io.github.Eszetael/postgres-mcp-hardened
C
No reviews yet

Read-only PostgreSQL over MCP. Writes refused at the parsed SQL, plus a READ ONLY transaction.

Full listing
PostgreSQL MCP Serverio.github.YawLabs/postgres-mcp
B
No reviews yet

PostgreSQL MCP server - query, schema introspection, explain, and health checks for AI assistants

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours PostgreSQL MCP Server (83/100 against 68).

 PostgreSQL (hardened, read-only)PostgreSQL MCP Server
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeC68/100B83/100
AdoptionGrowingGrowing
GitHub stars35
Downloads / week913.2k
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools—21
Write actions—3
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITMIT
Last release2026-09-202026-09-19
CategoryDatabasesDatabases

Other comparisons

PostgreSQL (hardened, read-only) vs DB AccessPostgreSQL (hardened, read-only) vs DBHubPostgreSQL (hardened, read-only) vs PostgreSQLPostgreSQL (hardened, read-only) vs StackQL MCP ServerPostgreSQL (hardened, read-only) vs Magic CloudAll Databases servers