Mmcp.market

Head to head

PostgreSQL (hardened, read-only) vs Magic Cloud

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

PostgreSQL (hardened, read-only)io.github.Eszetael/postgres-mcp-hardened
C
No reviews yet

Read-only PostgreSQL over MCP. Writes refused at the parsed SQL, plus a READ ONLY transaction.

Full listing
Magic Cloudio.github.polterguy/magic
A
No reviews yet

Generate secured CRUD APIs over your database, run SQL, manage files, tasks and a headless browser

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Magic Cloud (88/100 against 68).

 PostgreSQL (hardened, read-only)Magic Cloud
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeC68/100A88/100
AdoptionGrowingEstablished
GitHub stars31.2k
Downloads / week91–
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITMIT
Last release2026-09-202026-09-18
CategoryDatabasesDatabases

Other comparisons

PostgreSQL (hardened, read-only) vs DB AccessPostgreSQL (hardened, read-only) vs DBHubPostgreSQL (hardened, read-only) vs PostgreSQLPostgreSQL (hardened, read-only) vs StackQL MCP ServerPostgreSQL (hardened, read-only) vs PostgreSQL MCP ServerAll Databases servers