Head to head
PostgreSQL (hardened, read-only) vs Plumbline — a trust layer for LLM answers
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
PostgreSQL (hardened, read-only)
Cio.github.Eszetael/postgres-mcp-hardenedNo reviews yet
Read-only PostgreSQL over MCP. Writes refused at the parsed SQL, plus a READ ONLY transaction.
Full listingNo reviews yet
Every figure re-checked against SQL-computed facts; unsupported questions refused with the reason.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours PostgreSQL (hardened, read-only) (68/100 against 60). Plumbline — a trust layer for LLM answers is hosted and callable through the gateway; PostgreSQL (hardened, read-only) runs on your own machine. PostgreSQL (hardened, read-only) has noticeably more public adoption.
| PostgreSQL (hardened, read-only) | Plumbline — a trust layer for LLM answers | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C68/100 | C60/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 3 | – |
| Downloads / week | 91 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 18 |
| Write actions | — | 4 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-20 | — |
| Category | Databases | Databases |