Mmcp.market

Head to head

PostgreSQL (hardened, read-only) vs MINDSET

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

PostgreSQL (hardened, read-only)io.github.Eszetael/postgres-mcp-hardened
C
No reviews yet

Read-only PostgreSQL over MCP. Writes refused at the parsed SQL, plus a READ ONLY transaction.

Full listing
MINDSETapp.web.mindset-502113/mindset
C
No reviews yet

Semantic search over MINDSET's brand strategy topic database, plus its system prompt.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours PostgreSQL (hardened, read-only) (68/100 against 57). MINDSET is hosted and callable through the gateway; PostgreSQL (hardened, read-only) runs on your own machine. PostgreSQL (hardened, read-only) has noticeably more public adoption.

 PostgreSQL (hardened, read-only)MINDSET
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeC68/100C57/100
AdoptionGrowingNew
GitHub stars3–
Downloads / week91–
Runs whereYour machine (local)Hosted (remote)
Gateway-readyNoYes
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMIT—
Last release2026-09-20—
CategoryDatabasesDatabases

Other comparisons

PostgreSQL (hardened, read-only) vs DBHubPostgreSQL (hardened, read-only) vs PostgreSQLPostgreSQL (hardened, read-only) vs StackQL MCP ServerPostgreSQL (hardened, read-only) vs Magic CloudPostgreSQL (hardened, read-only) vs PostgreSQL MCP ServerAll Databases servers