Head to head
Healthclaw Guardrails vs Guardvibe
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Guardrailed FHIR access for AI agents: PHI redaction, audit trail, step-up auth, tenant isolation
Full listing
No reviews yet
Deterministic security layer your AI can't be. 503 rules, 39 tools, CLI + doctor + host audit.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Healthclaw Guardrails (87/100 against 58). Healthclaw Guardrails is hosted and callable through the gateway; Guardvibe runs on your own machine.
| Healthclaw Guardrails | Guardvibe | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A87/100 | C58/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 30 | 5 |
| Downloads / week | – | 63 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-25 | 2026-09-22 |
| Category | Security | Security |