Mmcp.market

Healthclaw Guardrails MCP server

by aks129·io.github.aks129/healthclaw-guardrails·v1.6.0
No reviews yet

Guardrailed FHIR access for AI agents: PHI redaction, audit trail, step-up auth, tenant isolation

A87/100grade A
Write a reviewRun it
What users say
No reviews yet
Be the first
Safety scan
A87/100

full report

Adoption
Growing

30 stars

Reviews

Write one

Nobody has reviewed Healthclaw Guardrails yet.

If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.

Healthclaw Guardrails tools

Tool list not cached yet. `describe` through the gateway fetches it live.

Public scan report

scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-26 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

no findings
  • –Code scanremote-only server, no package to scann/a
  • Live reliabilityremote reachable in 42ms (auth required)20/20
  • –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (endpoint requires auth); not countedn/a
  • Auth qualityauth enforced (bearer)9/15
  • Maintenancelast push 1 days ago15/15
  • Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10
Overall 87/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON

What the publisher says

From the Healthclaw Guardrails repository's README, as published. We do not edit it. Read it on GitHub

HealthClaw Guardrails

The open-source security layer between AI agents and clinical data.

FHIR standardized how health data is structured. MCP standardized how AI connects to tools. Nobody standardized the guardrails in between. This project does.

▶ Watch the 90-second demo All records are synthetic. The chat ran on a third-party model, best of four takes. No clinician has signed off yet. How it was made.

<!-- Project -->

<!-- Community metrics -->

<!-- Stack & scope -->

Quick Start · MCP Tools · Recipes · Roadmap · Claude Plugin · Architecture · healthclaw.io · Contributing · Dev Guide

Shortened. The full README is on GitHub.

Nothing above is checked by us. What we check is on the safety report.

Install directly

claude mcp add --transport http healthclaw-guardrails https://mcp-server-production-5112.up.railway.app/mcp
Add to Cursor

Healthclaw Guardrails: common questions

Is Healthclaw Guardrails MCP server safe?
Yes, by our scan: it is graded A (87/100). Read the Healthclaw Guardrails safety report
How do I install Healthclaw Guardrails?
It runs remotely at mcp-server-production-5112.up.railway.app. Add it to Claude Code, Claude Desktop or Cursor with the snippets above, or call it through the mcp.market gateway without installing anything.
Does Healthclaw Guardrails need an API key?
Yes. The registry entry asks for X-Step-Up-Token.
Is Healthclaw Guardrails maintained?
The last commit was in the last day (2026-09-25). The latest release is v1.6.0.
Is Healthclaw Guardrails up?
100% of our last 28 checks got an answer. We check remote servers about four times a day.
What can I use instead of Healthclaw Guardrails?
Servers from other publishers that do the same job: Bastion MCP server, ssh-mcp server and Mastyf AI MCP server. Compare all Healthclaw Guardrails alternatives.

Alternatives to Healthclaw Guardrails

Same job from other publishers: the closest match first, then the best rated.

All Healthclaw Guardrails alternatives →
  • Bastion
    Reliability + security proxy for MCP: runtime tool-security and a compliance-mapped audit trail.
    A
  • ssh-mcp
    MCP gateway for controlled SSH access with per-client auth, command policies, and audit logging.
    B
  • Mastyf AI
    Runtime proxy for MCP security, cost governance & audit
    B
  • spintax.net MCP server
    Write, validate, render and analyze spintax templates. Backed by @spintax/core. No auth.
    A
  • npm Registry MCP Server
    npm registry MCP server — package intelligence, security audits, dependency analysis
    B
Healthclaw Guardrails vs BastionHealthclaw Guardrails vs ssh-mcpHealthclaw Guardrails vs Mastyf AI

More from aks129 →