MCP.Market

Guardvibe MCP server

by goklab·io.github.goklab/guardvibe·v3.77.0·6 stars

Deterministic security layer your AI can't be. 670 rules, 39 tools, CLI + doctor + host audit.

C58/100grade C
What users say
No reviews yet
Be the first
Safety scan
C58/100

not scanned yet

Adoption
Growing

6 stars2.3k downloads/wk

Reviews

Write one

Nobody has reviewed Guardvibe yet.

If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.

Guardvibe tools

No tool declarations could be read from the package source. They show once the server is installed.

Not scanned yet. New listings are scanned within a day or two of arriving.

How Guardvibe compares

Against every graded Security MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score
58/100
higher than 13% of 917 Security servers
GitHub stars
6
more than 86% of 589 Security servers
Downloads a week
2,316
more than 95% of 386 Security servers with a package

Release history: 30 versions in the registry since 2026-07-23, latest 2026-11-14, typically one every 1 day.

Install Guardvibe in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code

Runs npx -y guardvibe on your machine. Read the scan report first; the gateway never runs local packages.

claude mcp add guardvibe -- npx -y guardvibe
Add to Cursor

What the publisher says

From the Guardvibe repository's README, as published. We do not edit it. Read it on GitHub

GuardVibe

Security infrastructure your AI can't be.

No matter how good your coding agent gets, it can't know the CVE published after its training cutoff, it can't deterministically guarantee the same check every run, it can't hold your whole repo in context, and it can't objectively review its own code. GuardVibe does all four — the deterministic, post-cutoff-current, whole-repo, author-independent verification layer for AI-written code.

  • 🗓️ Knows what your AI doesn't. CVE rules refreshed daily from GHSA / OSV.dev / CISA KEV — GuardVibe flags vulnerable dependencies published after your model's training cutoff. (97 CVE rules, npm run intel daily triage.)
  • 🎯 Deterministic, not probabilistic. Same code = same result, every run (content-hashed). Your AI guesses; GuardVibe doesn't.
  • 🗺️ Sees the whole repo. Cross-file taint + auth-coverage across every route — catches the unprotected endpoint your agent's narrow context missed.
  • 🔍 An independent second pair of eyes. The thing that wrote the code can't review itself. GuardVibe is the outside checker on AI-written code — in the loop while your AI codes (real-time edit hook), not after.
  • ⬅️ NEW: Starts before the first line of code. Every scanner on earth — including your agent reviewing itself — acts after the code exists. secureprompt acts before*: it analyzes the coding prompt itself, detects the stack and attack surfaces it implies, and embeds severity-ranked GuardVibe requirements into the prompt your AI executes. The vulnerability is prevented, not caught. Deterministic, zero LLM calls — and if the prompt is already secure, it passes through untouched.

The security MCP built for vibe coding. 472 security rules, 39 tools covering the entire AI-generated code journey — from the prompt itself to production deployment.

Works with Claude Code, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Codex, VS Code (Copilot), Windsurf, and any MCP-compatible coding agent.

Why a tool, when your AI is so good?

"More rules" was never the moat — a strong model already knows most security rules by heart. What it can't do is be deterministic, know the CVE published after its training cutoff, hold your whole repo in context, or objectively review the code it just wrote. Those four gaps are structural; they don't close as models improve. GuardVibe is the layer that fills them — running while your AI codes, not in a separate audit later. And since v3.19, it runs before your AI codes too: secure_prompt rewrites the task itself so the security requirements are in the prompt, not in the post-mortem.

Why GuardVibe

Most security tools are built for enterprise security teams. GuardVibe is built for you — the developer using AI to build and ship web apps fast.

Shortened. The full README is on GitHub.

Nothing above is checked by us. What we check is on the safety report.

Guardvibe: common questions

Is Guardvibe MCP server safe?
With care: it is graded C, so read the findings first (58/100). Read the Guardvibe safety report
How do I install Guardvibe?
It runs on your machine. Copy the Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Claude Desktop config from the install section.
Does Guardvibe need an API key?
Not as far as the registry entry and our scan can tell: no credentials are declared or required.
Is Guardvibe maintained?
The last commit was 13 days ago (2026-11-02). The latest release is v3.77.0.
What can I use instead of Guardvibe?
Servers from other publishers that do the same job: Wireshark MCP server, CodeInspectus MCP server and Bastion MCP server.
How does Guardvibe compare with other Security MCP servers?
safety score 58/100 (higher than 13% of 917 Security servers); github stars 6 (more than 86% of 589 Security servers); downloads a week 2,316 (more than 95% of 386 Security servers with a package). Full comparison.

Alternatives to Guardvibe

Same job from other publishers: the closest match first, then the best rated.

  • Wireshark
    Professional network analysis with tshark. Security audits, deep-dives, and threat detection.
    A
  • CodeInspectus
    Local-first MCP security scanner and CLI for AI-generated applications.
    C
  • Bastion
    Reliability + security proxy for MCP: runtime tool-security and a compliance-mapped audit trail.
    A
  • npm Registry MCP Server
    npm registry MCP server — package intelligence, security audits, dependency analysis
    B
  • Mastyf AI
    Runtime proxy for MCP security, cost governance & audit
    B