Head to head
Healthclaw Guardrails vs ssh-mcp
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Guardrailed FHIR access for AI agents: PHI redaction, audit trail, step-up auth, tenant isolation
Full listingssh-mcp
Bio.github.gelse/ssh-mcpNo reviews yet
MCP gateway for controlled SSH access with per-client auth, command policies, and audit logging.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Healthclaw Guardrails (87/100 against 73). Healthclaw Guardrails is hosted and callable through the gateway; ssh-mcp runs on your own machine.
| Healthclaw Guardrails | ssh-mcp | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A87/100 | B73/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 30 | 8 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-25 | 2026-09-16 |
| Category | Security | Security |