Head to head
AgentUtility Browser Workflow vs SeleniumBase MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
MCP server for the @agentutility browser-workflow cluster — pay-per-call x402 tools, no API keys…
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours SeleniumBase MCP (86/100 against 68). SeleniumBase MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| AgentUtility Browser Workflow | SeleniumBase MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C68/100 | A86/100 |
| Adoption | New | Widely used |
| GitHub stars | – | 13k |
| Downloads / week | – | 314k |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |