Mmcp.market

Head to head

AgentUtility Browser Workflow vs AIHawk

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

AgentUtility Browser Workflowai.agentutility/mcp-browser-workflow
C
No reviews yet

MCP server for the @agentutility browser-workflow cluster — pay-per-call x402 tools, no API keys…

Full listing
AIHawkio.github.feder-cr/aihawk
A
No reviews yet

AI browser agent: browses, clicks, types, and reads real web pages from plain-English instructions.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours AIHawk (92/100 against 68). AIHawk has noticeably more public adoption.

 AgentUtility Browser WorkflowAIHawk
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeC68/100A92/100
AdoptionNewWidely used
GitHub stars–32k
Downloads / week–6.0k
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITMIT
Last release—2026-09-18
CategoryScraping and browsingScraping and browsing

Other comparisons

AgentUtility Browser Workflow vs Reddit BuddyAgentUtility Browser Workflow vs SMSAgentUtility Browser Workflow vs SeleniumBase MCPAgentUtility Browser Workflow vs Browser UseAgentUtility Browser Workflow vs Ui.Vision MCPAll Scraping and browsing servers