Head to head
Ui.Vision MCP vs AgentUtility Browser Workflow
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
MCP server for browser and desktop automation: OCR, image recognition, real mouse and keyboard input
Full listingNo reviews yet
MCP server for the @agentutility browser-workflow cluster — pay-per-call x402 tools, no API keys…
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (69 and 68 out of 100). Ui.Vision MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| Ui.Vision MCP | AgentUtility Browser Workflow | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C69/100 | C68/100 |
| Adoption | Established | New |
| GitHub stars | 2.0k | – |
| Downloads / week | 534 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 24 | — |
| Write actions | 7 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | NOASSERTION | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-08-09 | — |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |