Mmcp.market

Head to head

AgentUtility Browser Workflow vs Browser Use

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

AgentUtility Browser Workflowai.agentutility/mcp-browser-workflow
C
No reviews yet

MCP server for the @agentutility browser-workflow cluster — pay-per-call x402 tools, no API keys…

Full listing
Browser Usecom.browser-use/browser-use
A
No reviews yet

Control a real Chrome browser to complete any task: fill forms, extract data, book flights.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Browser Use (95/100 against 68). Browser Use has noticeably more public adoption.

 AgentUtility Browser WorkflowBrowser Use
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeC68/100A95/100
AdoptionNewEstablished
GitHub stars–116k
Downloads / week––
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools—16
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITMIT
Last release—2026-09-25
CategoryScraping and browsingScraping and browsing

Other comparisons

AgentUtility Browser Workflow vs Reddit BuddyAgentUtility Browser Workflow vs SMSAgentUtility Browser Workflow vs SeleniumBase MCPAgentUtility Browser Workflow vs AIHawkAgentUtility Browser Workflow vs Ui.Vision MCPAll Scraping and browsing servers