Mmcp.market

Head to head

agent-exec vs Agent Wormhole

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

agent-execio.sslip.128.221.67.45.agent-exec/agent-exec
C
No reviews yet

Accountless pay-per-use sandbox execution, storage, locks, attestation and handoff; pay via x402.

Full listing
Agent Wormholeio.github.runningoffcode/wormhole-x402
B
No reviews yet

Check tokens, pages and x402 payments before your agent trusts them. Offline verdicts.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Agent Wormhole (83/100 against 60). agent-exec is hosted and callable through the gateway; Agent Wormhole runs on your own machine. Agent Wormhole has noticeably more public adoption.

 agent-execAgent Wormhole
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeC60/100B83/100
AdoptionNewGrowing
GitHub stars–3
Downloads / week–776
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools35
Write actions1—
Price per callFreeFree
Licence—Apache-2.0
Last release—2026-09-19
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

agent-exec vs Maginaryagent-exec vs BridgeNode MCPagent-exec vs Auscaagent-exec vs MCPagent-exec vs MCP ServerAll AI and agents servers