Mmcp.market

Head to head

agent-exec vs Ausca

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

agent-execio.sslip.128.221.67.45.agent-exec/agent-exec
C
No reviews yet

Accountless pay-per-use sandbox execution, storage, locks, attestation and handoff; pay via x402.

Full listing
Auscacom.ausca/agent-services
B
No reviews yet

Pay-per-call APIs and MCP services for agents, no accounts or keys, with verifiable receipts.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Ausca (84/100 against 60). Ausca has noticeably more public adoption.

 agent-execAusca
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeC60/100B84/100
AdoptionNewEstablished
GitHub stars–15
Downloads / week–220
Runs whereHosted (remote)Hosted (remote)
Gateway-readyYesYes
Tools314
Write actions12
Price per callFreeFree
Licence—MIT
Last release—2026-09-18
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

agent-exec vs Maginaryagent-exec vs BridgeNode MCPagent-exec vs MCPagent-exec vs MCP Serveragent-exec vs Trusty SquireAll AI and agents servers