Head to head
agent-exec vs MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
agent-exec
Cio.sslip.128.221.67.45.agent-exec/agent-execNo reviews yet
Accountless pay-per-use sandbox execution, storage, locks, attestation and handoff; pay via x402.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours MCP (99/100 against 60). MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| agent-exec | MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C60/100 | A99/100 |
| Adoption | New | Established |
| GitHub stars | – | 533 |
| Downloads / week | – | 297 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 3 | — |
| Write actions | 1 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |