Mmcp.market

Head to head

agent-exec vs Maginary

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

agent-execio.sslip.128.221.67.45.agent-exec/agent-exec
C
No reviews yet

Accountless pay-per-use sandbox execution, storage, locks, attestation and handoff; pay via x402.

Full listing
Maginaryio.github.maginaryai/maginary-mcp
B
No reviews yet

AI image + video generation for agents: --flag prompt DSL, async generate/poll, x402 pay-per-use.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Maginary (83/100 against 60). Maginary has noticeably more public adoption.

 agent-execMaginary
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeC60/100B83/100
AdoptionNewGrowing
GitHub stars–1
Downloads / week–1.2k
Runs whereHosted (remote)Hosted (remote)
Gateway-readyYesYes
Tools316
Write actions16
Price per callFreeFree
Licence—MIT
Last release—2026-09-15
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

agent-exec vs BridgeNode MCPagent-exec vs Auscaagent-exec vs MCPagent-exec vs MCP Serveragent-exec vs Trusty SquireAll AI and agents servers