Mmcp.market

Head to head

Phi Guard vs Servosity MCP

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Phi Guardio.github.Abidit/phi-guard-mcp
A
No reviews yet

Local-first PHI detection for source code, LLM prompts, logs, and analytics

Full listing
Servosity MCPio.github.Servosity/servosity-mcp
B
No reviews yet

Fleet-wide backup triage, stale-backup detection, and cross-engine analytics for any MCP agent.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Phi Guard (92/100 against 75).

 Phi GuardServosity MCP
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA92/100B75/100
AdoptionGrowingGrowing
GitHub stars041
Downloads / week90–
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools2—
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITNOASSERTION
Last release2026-09-182026-09-18
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

Phi Guard vs Agent-Native AnalyticsPhi Guard vs HOL GuardPhi Guard vs prompt-protectionPhi Guard vs mcpmPhi Guard vs haiku.ragAll AI and agents servers